| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arnie Macy" wrote in message ... "Clint" wrote ... I believe that making references and using analogies that you guys are the adults and new, entry level hams are children pretty much describes a superior if not condescending attitude. __________________________________________________ ______________ That's a pretty big brush you've got there, Clint. Please reference *any* post I've made where I said, or implied that I consider no-code hams as children. I'll wait here. Arnie - KT4ST I suspect that Clint was actually referring indirectly to some of my posts as I have used the parent/child analogy and student/teacher analogy. However he likes to take this as meaning a superior and/or condescending attitude. He fails to be willing to admit that the less experienced should take the advice of the more experienced while they develop sufficient background to make informed choices. He has obviously missed my posts where I have clearly said that if I were interested in satellite work, I would go consult the most experienced satellite operator in our local club, who happens in this case to be a Technician. I am more than willing to respect his expertise. I would willingly, in this area, be the "child" or "student" in learning this activity. If I doubted what he told me about satellite work, I would first wait until I had equal experience before challenging his experience. However, Clint wants to challenge the issue from a point of inexperience and feels that he should be taken seriously. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors | |||