"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote:

This is quite entertaining. Here we have a card-carrying
member of the NCTA, a group which has spent the last
dozen years or so blaming us ever so politically incorrect
PCTA's of keeping the ARS securely locked up in the
"past," and now you're trying to make the "past" code use
of non-amateur radio services somehow relevant to the
present-day issue of continued code testing. Having
memory problems?


First, other than ARRL, I'm not a card carrying member of any Amateur
Radio group. Second, the opinions expressed by others don't apply to me and
I certainly don't represent the views of others. So please stop trying to
throw me into a group you dislike in an effort to dismiss what I have to
say.


One of the leading arguments *against* code testing
throughout this debate has always been that the use of
(Morse) code has been deemed to be irrelevant in non-
amateur radio services.


Which debate is that, Larry? The debates with me or the debates you've had
with others. I've never said anything of the sorts in the debates you and I
have had. My position has been consistent throughout those debates.


I have given the "relevant facts" ad nauseum. (snip)


Nonsense.


I haven't twisted a damn thing, Dwight, and you know it.


You haven't stop twisting things, Larry - right up to the message where
you posted the sentence above.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/