"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Arnie Macy" wrote:

Oh Really? I brought up a very factual survey along
with two other facts concerning CW and you refused
to respond (other than to say you wouldn't respond)
I asked you in another thread to explain a little bit about
some of the new technology that you say you know so
well (and we CW'ers don't). I'm *still* waiting for an
answer on that one. (snip)


Let's turn that around at little, Arnie. I haven't seen Clint going
around
claiming to be superior. Instead, it is those in your circle claiming
to
be
the superior hams. Other than code, what skills or knowledge of
technology
can be found in the pro-code crowd that cannot be found among the
no-code
crowd? From what I've seen, there are just as many highly skilled
individuals in the no-code crowd as there are in the pro-code crowd,
working
in just as many professional careers. So, if there is no real
difference
between the two, why do those like yourself continue to support, or at
least
nor object to, the superior ham position of some in this newsgroup and
elsewhere? The only possible answer I can see is that you also
consider
those like yourself to be superior hams.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/



Perhaps you think those that know/use Morse are superior to you. I
don't
ever recall seeing anyone that advocates Morse saying they felt
superior.


I believe that making references and using analogies that you guys are the
adults and new, entry level hams are children pretty much describes
a superior if not condescending attitude.

Clint
KB5ZHT

--

--

Get in touch with your soul: www.glennbeck.com
OR, if you're a liberal, maybe you can FIND one


--



Now why did I know you had to make a comment Clint?

Here is one right back to you ...ten four?

If the shoe fits, wear it.

Have a nice day.

Dan/W4NTI