| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , "Clint" rattlehead at computron
dot net writes: I don't whine or nag. Yea, you pretty much do. I have a strong belief in my position code testing, and I am able to state it with clarity, passion, and conviction. But simply without any convincing debate points or ideas other than "do it, we all had to" and "do it because you are told to do it, you are a insert childish, juvenile personal attack here if you do not want to. Clint: Please provide either the direct quotes from me where I have made such statements in the exact manner and with the exact meaning that you infer, or your immediate apology for mischaracterizing my postings on this topic. I'll give you a clue: I have very carefully avoided saying those things. I have always supported my position on code testing on the basis of the value of the Morse/CW mode to the ARS, and the need for radio amateurs to learn and gain useful proficiency in this mode in order to exploit it's many advantageous features and benefits. I've NEVER said, "I had to take code tests, so you should have to," except in this very sentence. You, Kim, and most of the NCTA appear to be limited to name-calling -- boy if that' isn't the pot calling the kettle black. WHO is doing the name calling? it's not the NCTA group calling the PCTA "lazy", "stupid", and an assortment of complex insults using spurious comparisons. I may have referred to NCTA's as "lazy," but not "stupid." As a matter of fact, I find that lazy people are usually quite ingenious in finding ways to avoid doing things they can't be bothered to do. Everyone is "lazy" about something. I'm lazy about a lot of things. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors | |||