LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 2nd 03, 10:58 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"N2EY" wrote:

I disagree!

Apply that logic to some other skill or knowledge. For example,
the Smith Chart. (snip)

Or how about Ohm's Law? The phonetic alphabet? Typing skills?



Those are all skills or knowledge that can be used by every ham radio
operator. Not so with Morse Code.


You think that skills do not transfer in any way? I disagree!



I think code skill does not transfer to "more experienced" or "more
qualified" when discussing a ham radio operator instead of code alone.


Sorry Dwight, you're simply off base on this one. I cannot see
how you can deny that having Morse code skills makes a ham
more experienced and more qualified - all else being equal.



More experienced and more qualified in what, Jim? Morse Code only, not as
a ham operator. With the Technician license, the FCC has already established
that Morse Code is not a qualification needed to be a ham radio operator.
Therefore, Morse Code cannot be used when deciding who is "more experienced"
or "more qualified" as a ham radio operator.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does a 6146B fail? Angel Vilaseca Boatanchors 12 March 5th 04 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017