Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote: Those who pushed for the Tech no code license loudly and repeatedly claimed that it would lead to a major influx of technically bright hams that would lead to significant technical advances in ham radio since it was supposedly code keeping them out. Well that influx of technical types didn't happen. (snip) It didn't? I have a Tech license and consider myself fairly well informed when it comes to technology. I don't know how bright I am, or if my involvement will ever lead to "significant technical advances in ham radio," but at least I'm here. Am I the only one? I'd surely hate to shoulder this burdon alone. Aren't you being a little unrealistic, Dee? Did you really expect this group to offer up "significant technical advances" in a mature radio environment? For that matter, did you really expect this one group to offer anything more than the other license holders today? Radio is in the evolution stage at this point, not the revolution stage. Changes will come, but they're certainly not likely to be earth shattering changes. I personally do not have such an expectation nor is it a comment on any individual Technician licensee. Most of the Techs I know are indeed quite bright and well informed on technology. I was merely pointing out why some people seem to put so much pressure on Technicians, i.e. the proponents of the change "sold it" by using the "big influx of technologically oriented new hams and signficant technical advances" as one of the key elements of their argument. That argument was invalid then and is equally invalid now. In my opinion, almost every argument posed on both sides (for or against code testing) has major flaws and is invalid. Personally I consider basic code one of the fundamentals of radio even if one chooses not to use it after learning it. As a basic, I believe it should be tested. That is the position I will continue to support. And I will continue to promote code use whether the code testing is dropped or not. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors |