LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 3rd 03, 02:29 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:

More experienced and more qualified in what, Jim? Morse Code only, not as
a ham operator. With the Technician license, the FCC has already established
that Morse Code is not a qualification needed to be a ham radio operator.


Dwight:

Incorrect. The Technician class license infers that knowledge of Morse
code isn't required to be an *entry-level* amateur radio operator. There
are two higher classes which require a code test.

Therefore, Morse Code cannot be used when deciding who is "more experienced"
or "more qualified" as a ham radio operator.


Of course it can, since becoming a General- or Extra-class ham still
requires a code test, and always has.

If and when the Element 1(a) code test is abolished, that will simply prove
that the FCC has a low opinion of the ARS as a whole, and that it responds
to political pressure -- i.e. petitions to remove code testing, and the
comments
which support them.

73 de Larry, K3LT

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does a 6146B fail? Angel Vilaseca Boatanchors 12 March 5th 04 07:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017