Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: More experienced and more qualified in what, Jim? Morse Code only, not as a ham operator. With the Technician license, the FCC has already established that Morse Code is not a qualification needed to be a ham radio operator. Dwight: Incorrect. The Technician class license infers that knowledge of Morse code isn't required to be an *entry-level* amateur radio operator. There are two higher classes which require a code test. Therefore, Morse Code cannot be used when deciding who is "more experienced" or "more qualified" as a ham radio operator. Of course it can, since becoming a General- or Extra-class ham still requires a code test, and always has. If and when the Element 1(a) code test is abolished, that will simply prove that the FCC has a low opinion of the ARS as a whole, and that it responds to political pressure -- i.e. petitions to remove code testing, and the comments which support them. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors |