"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Huh -- the definition of a dipole is:
Definition: 1.. [n] an aerial half a wavelength long consisting
of
two rods connected to a transmission line at the center
So whats with this 1/4 stuff ???


Dont confuse them. These are the same people who think the A-99 has 9.9 DB
Gain.

Now just a minute here Bruce. I had a A-99 on ten meters. And compared to
my Heathkit Cantenna it had 9.9 db gain.

So there.

Dan/W4NTI

Help me out here. What sort of a 'balun' or what sort of 'coax' will match
such a device to a 50 to 75 ohm unbalanced output of a usual ARS
transmitter?

Since the Texas TWIT has me blocked, I am addressing this to you Bruce.

Dan/W4NTI

Well I dont know Dan, maybe we could use a Getter to feed it, it might match
it.

Its the new hamspeak from the dumbed down amongst us.

Dan/W4NTI


Its what Uncle Bob at the Local truck stop told them.

Now just a minute here Bruce. I had a A-99 on ten meters. And compared to
my Heathkit Cantenna it had 9.9 db gain.

So there.

Dan/W4NTI


Well your right on that Dan, but it probably had 20 DB Gain referenced to a
Cantenna.

"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
The term 'Dumbass' comes to mind here.

Dan/W4NTI


Well thats 1 term that sounds about right, but how about No-Coder, most of
them
dont have a CLUE either.

It is not a problem to be ignorant. Its being too stupid to learn that is
the problem.

Dan/W4NTI

"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Help me out here. What sort of a 'balun' or what sort of 'coax' will
match
such a device to a 50 to 75 ohm unbalanced output of a usual ARS
transmitter?

Since the Texas TWIT has me blocked, I am addressing this to you Bruce.

Dan/W4NTI

Well I dont know Dan, maybe we could use a Getter to feed it, it might
match
it.

Your right...a getter would do it....but do you think we need a grid leak
pan to catch the left overs?

Dan/W4NTI

In article .net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:

The term 'Dumbass' comes to mind here.

Please don't call others by your family names...

LHA

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

Being licensed as a Novice would be a vast improvement for most of these
geniuii. *Definitely*
and most especially in the case of Putzie-Poo.

Ya gotta wonder how they plan to match these 1/4 wave dipoles at their
highest impedance point.

"Uhhh.... say wot?"


Well, DICK, make that dick, matching is the name of the game with nearly any
"wire" type antenna, so you must be too dumbed down to pick up on that
concept. It doesn't matter the matching, it was said first there was no
such thing as a 1/4 wave antenna. Then, when proof positive was given, the
*cough* superior hams (such as you in your mind) said "it would never work."
Then, when proof positive was given, all that's being done now is sneering.

So, superior ham(s) et al, try again....

Kim, he can NOT do so.

All we get out of DICK is a lot of gratuitous insults and denigrations.

I guess that's what the "superiors" in US ham radio think is the "proper
attitude" of hams?

LHA

Hey, Dan? Approach this: _ _ | _ _

Kim W5TIT


Whats that, a picture of you on your Back with 1 TIT sticking up.

"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Hey, Dan? Approach this: _ _ | _ _

Kim W5TIT


Whats that, a picture of you on your Back with 1 TIT sticking up.

I have no idea what that means. But coming from her its probably vulgar.

Dan/W4NTI