Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
WA8ULX wrote:
just as good as 1/4 Wave Dipoles, with 1 advantage, you will not need as much wire or space to install it. A tuner is probably helpfull, but many people report a good match can be obtained using RG-58. It appears the best way to get a match using coax is to, coil about 8' of Coax at the back of the rig and the same at the fed point. Bruce, now you let the cat out of the bag! Soon all hams will know that the whole idea of putting up these large antennas is just another ploy of PCTA's to keep those they consider inferior from getting on the air! This forces people who have enough land only to put up an antenna. More elitist snobbery! Fact is. ANY dipole of ANY fractional length works just great! Don't have enough space for a 1/8th wave dipole? Put up a 1/16 wave dipole. Or a 1/32 wave. In fact, dump the silly fractions, and put up a ..001 wave dipole antenna. Now for the deepest darkest little known fact of radio antennas............ They work better the SMALLER they are!!!!! The reason for this is that by concentrating the power into a smaller space, the rf excited electrons *push* the rf out of the antenna much more energetically than in those stupid half wave antennas. Once the rf is out of the antenna, nothing slows it dow, but in a half wave antenna, the electrons get tired pushing through all that wire. - mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
vertical dipole? | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna | |||
1/4 Wave Dipoles | Policy | |||
How does the rainbow tuner work? | Antenna |