| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N2EY" wrote in message
... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "Brian" wrote in message . com... Furthermore, if the US government wants to give all prospective amateurs 3 hots and a cot, and a paycheck, for the duration it takes to learn the code, I'd gladly enroll in the CG Morse Code school. There's one problem ... there IS no CG Morse Code school any more ... Sad but true. the services are NOT teaching their radiomen Morse any more. Even if they were - would it make any difference to your opinion of the need for code testing in the amateur radio service? It would add *some* potential validity to the "trained (in Morse) pool of operators" part of 97.1 ... however, that is not the case and hasn't been for some time ... It wouldn't be a "slam-dunk" in favor of continued Morse testing for HF ham licenses though. 73, Carl - wk3c |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New Web Forum | Homebrew | |||
| FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
| BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy | |||