"Dick Carroll" wrote in message
...
Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

Maybe so, but it's not the FCC's business to determine how much
someone "values" a ham license ... only to determine if they meet
the minimum qualifications established. Besides, just because someone
did the work of learning BEFORE they decided to become a ham
doesn't mean they didn't still "do the work." Why should that
(previously
accomplished) work be "devalued" as some suggest???

WHERE do you come up with some of this stuff???

Which points would you dispute?

Do you believe the FCC has a responsibility to determine how
much someone values a ham license?

Do you look less favorably on those that learned electronics
as a vocation and, therefore, excercised only minimal
or no effort to pass the ham tests?

Do you look less favorably on those that learned morse code
as a vocation and, therefore, excercised only minimal
or no effort to pass the ham tests?

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK