LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19   Report Post  
Old October 8th 03, 12:08 PM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bill Sohl" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Dick Carroll" wrote in message
...
Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

Maybe so, but it's not the FCC's business to determine how much
someone "values" a ham license ... only to determine if they meet
the minimum qualifications established. Besides, just because someone
did the work of learning BEFORE they decided to become a ham
doesn't mean they didn't still "do the work." Why should that

(previously
accomplished) work be "devalued" as some suggest???


WHERE do you come up with some of this stuff???


Which points would you dispute?


DICK has no point (no pun intended). Haven't you ever noticed that all DICK
does is join the masses he follows but never has any true intelligent
argument to make himself? Kind of like when someone speaks up, and a
sidekick says, "YEAH, what he said!"

Kim W5TIT


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Web Forum Peter Homebrew 0 September 14th 04 10:07 PM
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments Old Dxer Policy 0 August 5th 03 02:22 PM
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED Rob Kemp Policy 0 July 10th 03 07:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017