Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message
ink.net... "Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: Maybe so, but it's not the FCC's business to determine how much someone "values" a ham license ... only to determine if they meet the minimum qualifications established. Besides, just because someone did the work of learning BEFORE they decided to become a ham doesn't mean they didn't still "do the work." Why should that (previously accomplished) work be "devalued" as some suggest??? WHERE do you come up with some of this stuff??? Which points would you dispute? DICK has no point (no pun intended). Haven't you ever noticed that all DICK does is join the masses he follows but never has any true intelligent argument to make himself? Kind of like when someone speaks up, and a sidekick says, "YEAH, what he said!" Kim W5TIT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Web Forum | Homebrew | |||
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy |