Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
Of course. But in this case dropping the word "test" changes the meaning tremendously. Not when the two parties are participating in a conversation specifically about dropping the code test, which is the current debate throughout the ham radio community, Jim. Therefore, anyone who wants to change the debate to focus on code itself, instead of the code test, would have the burdon of being more specific to have his or her intent fully understood. In reality, requiring specifics with each message posted in an existing debate would tend to stiffle that debate, which I suspect is the underlying goal of some of those demanding specific words and phrases from their opposition in this debate. I don't drop words that are needed for clarity. (snip) Clarity of what - explicitness, focus, intent, meaning, unambiguity, or all of these? There are many types of clarity, Jim. Without specifics, I cannot be certain exactly what you mean. ;-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |