Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight Stewart wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote: The Tech (no code) has no HF test questions. (as I understand it). Thus there is no reason a Tech (no code) would, or should be qualified to operate HF. Didn't you take the Technician license exam, Dan? If so, you should be able to remember that it does indeed have questions about HF (bands, sub-bands, propagation, operating considerations, code use, and so on). After all, Tech Plus license holders, with limited HF privileges, take the exact same written exam. Some Novice material (also limited HF privileges) was added to the Tech license exam. Remember any of this? Now, what were your reasons again for no-code Techs not being qualified to operate HF? My pre '87 tech license was the General written test. Which obviously had to ask about HF. Aside from propagation, there really is nothing different about HF vs. VHF or UHF. Oh, okay, you don't get to build a 20 element rotatable beam for 80m. Unless you can borrow an aircraft carrier..... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |