Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... Carl R. Stevenson wrote: And I think the three classes of license are reasonable and appropriate. Tech becomes the "entry" license, general is "mid-grade," and extra is "top." I don't see anything wrong with that ... What do you think would be a good division knowledge wise between the classes? The tech and general are not too bad now, knowledge to privileges. I lean a bit toward having the Extra require a bit more knowledge, or perhaps experience. I know a few no-experience Extra's and it just seems (to me) that some "time in grade" might make the license more meaningful. - Mike KB3EIA - I wouldn't oppose a bit more "meat" on the Extra written ... but I would oppose any "time in grade" requirements. Folks either qualify (pass the test) or not ... "time in grade" unnecessarily discriminates against people who are qualified by making them wait unnecessarily. 73, Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |