Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 05:10 PM
Alun Palmer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in
:


Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The
extra used to mean something. Now it means squat.

Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was
going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now.

Dan/W4NTI


All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the
20wpm code was dropped.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


The real observation here is to note a complaint about extra class hams
not knowing
what the length of a 1/2 wave dipole was on a given frequency; has
nothing to do
with sending and recieving morse code skill.

Kinda showed your colors there.

Clint




It was a dead giveaway. Anyone who thinks that 20wpm code operating skill
means you know all about dipoles has a serious problem that no amount of
discussion will ever change.

73 de Alun, N3KIP
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 05:28 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alun Palmer wrote:

"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in
:


Man you got that right Mike. It was that way, decades ago. The
extra used to mean something. Now it means squat.

Don't believe me? Look at the before and after code gutting. I was
going to get a fancy 1X2 years ago. Glad I didn't now.

Dan/W4NTI

All the 1x2 sequentially assigned calls were gone long before the
20wpm code was dropped.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


The real observation here is to note a complaint about extra class hams
not knowing
what the length of a 1/2 wave dipole was on a given frequency; has
nothing to do
with sending and recieving morse code skill.

Kinda showed your colors there.

Clint





It was a dead giveaway. Anyone who thinks that 20wpm code operating skill
means you know all about dipoles has a serious problem that no amount of
discussion will ever change.


The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements,
ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread.

That an extra might have no idea about the length of a half wave dipole
at 40 meters - or more importantly, precisely no idea on how to
calculate it - indicates a more serious problem to me.

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 05:49 PM
Clint
 
Posts: n/a
Default



The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements,
ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread.


They may or may not; if the FCC decides that no "no further change in the
license structure is required at this time" then of course that will be the
final
word on *that* matter, and we'll accept it and go on since they are the
ones that have the final say. I just couldn't help but notice how certain
ones
in here I think have such an overpowering agenda regarding the CW
part of the testing that it tends to take them over and govern, or at least
seriously influence, everything they have to remark about in ham radio.

I'm a general class operator; I realize by definition that means I had to
show knowledge in certain areas to prove I deserved recieving the next
higher license class than tech-plus; however, I did not demonstrate enough
skill and knowledge to warrant recieving the advanced class license.
Therefore,
advanced class operators *should* know more than I do, or at least as much.

That brings us to the sad truth that if an *extra* class license operator
doesn't
know how to calculate the length of a walf wave dipole on 40m (or whatever
frequency), that is a serious issue. I say that because calculating the
length of
an antenna, especially a halfwave dipole of ALL things, is and always WILL
be so basic to ham radio that it should be on page one of chapter one of
every study guide ever printed. Such matters is why I put such a strong
emphasis on putting more priority on written testing than that of the skills
of
translating a CW transmission.

Sad thing is, most the time I get on 75 meters and begin discussing ham
radio
tech stuff, there is usually one heckler that harangues you about it and
makes
light of the fact that you were talking about ham radio stuff and not what
the
weather was like on a day 58 years ago while an old man sat on a porch
and peeled potatoes in the hot summer sun... true story. I actually was on
the
airwaves a few weeks ago discussing the pros and cons how how to set up
a new 75 meter inverted V I was going to make at home... and as soon as
I finished the conversation with the other ham and he went off the air, a
couple
of hams got in there and began talking to one another BASHING me for doing
so... can you imagine???

Clint


  #4   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 05:58 PM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm a general class operator; I realize by definition that means I had to
show knowledge in certain areas to prove I deserved recieving the next


You didnt prove knowledge, all you proved was that you did a GOOD JOB of
Memorizing some Q@As.
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 06:55 PM
Clint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
I'm a general class operator; I realize by definition that means I had to
show knowledge in certain areas to prove I deserved recieving the next


You didnt prove knowledge, all you proved was that you did a GOOD JOB of
Memorizing some Q@As.


Do you guys dream about morse code tests?




  #6   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 09:24 PM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do you guys dream about morse code tests?



Look lid you still dont get it, I am well aware the CW test is gone, my
complaint still is the Give away Written.
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 5th 03, 10:24 PM
Clint
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You're not fooling anybody.

--

Reasons why it sucks to be a liberal....
file overrun error

--
"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Do you guys dream about morse code tests?



Look lid you still dont get it, I am well aware the CW test is gone, my
complaint still is the Give away Written.



  #8   Report Post  
Old October 6th 03, 01:02 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Do you guys dream about morse code tests?



Look lid you still dont get it, I am well aware the CW test is gone, my
complaint still is the Give away Written.


Don't confuse him Bruce....he thinks he is on a roll.

Dan/W4NTI


  #9   Report Post  
Old October 26th 03, 11:18 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WA8ULX wrote:

Do you guys dream about morse code tests?





Look lid you still dont get it, I am well aware the CW test is gone, my
complaint still is the Give away Written.


So why are we all not extras, then? If the writtens are so easy?

  #10   Report Post  
Old October 6th 03, 01:01 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...


The new requirements *probably* will have no Morse code requirements,
ergo Morse is not really relevant to this thread.


They may or may not; if the FCC decides that no "no further change in the
license structure is required at this time" then of course that will be

the
final
word on *that* matter, and we'll accept it and go on since they are the
ones that have the final say. I just couldn't help but notice how certain
ones
in here I think have such an overpowering agenda regarding the CW
part of the testing that it tends to take them over and govern, or at

least
seriously influence, everything they have to remark about in ham radio.

I'm a general class operator; I realize by definition that means I had to
show knowledge in certain areas to prove I deserved recieving the next
higher license class than tech-plus; however, I did not demonstrate enough
skill and knowledge to warrant recieving the advanced class license.
Therefore,
advanced class operators *should* know more than I do, or at least as

much.

That brings us to the sad truth that if an *extra* class license operator
doesn't
know how to calculate the length of a walf wave dipole on 40m (or whatever
frequency), that is a serious issue. I say that because calculating the
length of
an antenna, especially a halfwave dipole of ALL things, is and always WILL
be so basic to ham radio that it should be on page one of chapter one of
every study guide ever printed. Such matters is why I put such a strong
emphasis on putting more priority on written testing than that of the

skills
of
translating a CW transmission.

Sad thing is, most the time I get on 75 meters and begin discussing ham
radio
tech stuff, there is usually one heckler that harangues you about it and
makes
light of the fact that you were talking about ham radio stuff and not what
the
weather was like on a day 58 years ago while an old man sat on a porch
and peeled potatoes in the hot summer sun... true story. I actually was on
the
airwaves a few weeks ago discussing the pros and cons how how to set up
a new 75 meter inverted V I was going to make at home... and as soon as
I finished the conversation with the other ham and he went off the air, a
couple
of hams got in there and began talking to one another BASHING me for doing
so... can you imagine???

Clint



Sure can Clint. And you just made my point.

Dan/W4NTI




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing Arf! Arf! General 0 January 11th 04 10:09 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 2 December 22nd 03 05:13 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 0 December 22nd 03 06:32 AM
Change of frequency of EM signal Tommaso Parrinello Antenna 0 November 27th 03 05:26 PM
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source Tarmo Tammaru Antenna 18 August 30th 03 04:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017