Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: "N2EY" wrote: Incorrect. What "push"? Based on membership numbers, NCI has fewer than 5000 members worldwide (snip) Oh, come on, Jim. What is this "what push" nonsense? The push to remove code testing that so many pro-code test advocates, including yourself on occasion, have been ranting about in this newsgroups for so very many years. "Ranting"? Perhaps I could have worded my post better. My point is that the whole issue is not a mass movement. Clint claimed, without any proof, that most hams want code testing gone. Yet surveys show the opposite. The fact remains that out of over 680,000 US hams, fewer than 1% have joined NCI. As you well know, NCI is only a tiny part of the overall movement to end code testing - far more outside that organization are involved (including some in this newsgroup you've personally discussed this issue with). How do we know this? The restructuring NPRM gathered fewer than 2500 comments, even though the comment period was extremely long and the whole thing given lots of publicity in the amateur press. Compare that to how many comments the NOI on BPL has gathered in a much shorter time. To now try to move the focus solely to NCI, while knowing full well that so many others are involved, is just not being honest about the situation. Who are "so many others", Dwight? If they really exist, why haven't they signed on to NCI, which costs nothing more than a few mouse clicks? Do you honestly think denying the push to remove code testing will somehow make it go away? Do you honestly think denying the existence of others outside NCI will somehow make them disappear? It isn't going to happen, Jim. I'm not denying any of that. Sorry if it seemed that way. The movement to end code testing has never been stronger. To deny that, in light of all that has happened over the last few years, would bring into question a person's sanity. How about the claim that most hams want it, despite all the surveys showing the opposite? And if it's such a done deal, why didn't FCC just dump Element 1 back in July? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |