| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dick Carroll
writes: Bill Sohl wrote: "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , When was the survey done? If it is more than two years old, it is almost useless as there has been significant change over the last few years. Really??? Where is the documentation to back up that statement in the face of the large majority of code supporting commentors to 98-143? Senior, you need to look at public documentation (information available to all) before you move your stunner to "kill" setting. The ONLY statistical study on NPRM 98-143 Comments was done INFORMALLY by one of the later Commenters who was apparently interested enough to take the time to examine each and every one of (then) over 2000 Comments. Those two are still in the FCC ECFS, part of the 2.760 total documents on 98-143. LHA |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
| Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
| Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
| Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
| SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna | |||