Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 12th 03, 11:33 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Dick Carroll
writes:

Bill Sohl wrote:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...

In article ,


When was the survey done? If it is more than two years old, it
is almost useless as there has been significant change
over the last few years.


Really??? Where is the documentation to back up that statement in the
face of the large majority of code supporting commentors to 98-143?


Senior, you need to look at public documentation (information
available to all) before you move your stunner to "kill" setting.

The ONLY statistical study on NPRM 98-143 Comments was done
INFORMALLY by one of the later Commenters who was apparently
interested enough to take the time to examine each and every one of
(then) over 2000 Comments. Those two are still in the FCC ECFS,
part of the 2.760 total documents on 98-143.

LHA
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing Arf! Arf! General 0 January 11th 04 10:09 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 2 December 22nd 03 05:13 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 0 December 22nd 03 06:32 AM
Change of frequency of EM signal Tommaso Parrinello Antenna 0 November 27th 03 05:26 PM
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source Tarmo Tammaru Antenna 18 August 30th 03 04:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017