| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Hans K0HB" wrote in message om... "Bill Sohl" wrote Mega Dittos. I especially like the "catch 22" prohibition of new modes. Frankly I'm surprised that Joe didn't think of that. I sent a courtesy copy of my comments to the author of RM-10808. Here is his response. 73, de Hans, K0HB __________________________________________________ ______ RESPONSE FROM AH0A __________________________________________________ ______ Thanks for taking the time to respond, although your last comment was a bit strong. The idea behind the petition was to try to retain some "merit" badge testing It's not govt's legitimate purpose to have "merit badge testing." and a "reward" for learning. I fail to understand why removing Morse testing is any different from removing all aspects of RTTY knowledge from the written test, e.g. "T8A10. What would you connect to a transceiver for RTTY operation?". Clearly AH0A can't understand (or accept) that the RTTY example is "theoretical knowledge" and the Morse test is a test of a mechanical skill ... while I don't advocate it, a touch-typing test would be more relevant to the future of ham radio than a Morse test. [snip] Anyway I want to assure you I that I put thought into the petition and sincerely believe that CW testing for CW privileges was a compromise. It appears that AH0A either did not read the R&O in 98-143 and the denials of the Petitions for Reconsideration that were filed, or he didn't understand/accept what the FCC clearly said. Carl - wk3c |