Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes: Carl: I consider the use of the term "Morse myths" to be derogatory and inflammatory. Thus, you have also failed to meet Mike's challenge. 73 de Larry, K3LT Larry, I don't recall Mike appointing your the judge and arbiter ... Carl: In that case, consider my services to have been donated out of my own generosity. "Morse Myths" is, as you well know by now, simply a term that refers to all of the patently false, old wives' tales, such as "Morse gets through when nothing else will.", This one is true… "Morse is essential for emergency communications.", Who said that? Provide correctly attributed quote. "Morse acts as a 'lid filter' to keep us from being overrun by the "mongul hordes' of CBers who are lurking in the wings waiting to take over the ham bands." etc. I've never said that whatsoever -- in fact, on many occasions, I've gone out of my way to note that a lot of the problems on HF phone are being caused by 20-WPM code tested Extras. I reject your claim that the term "Morse Myths" is derogatory and inflamatory. Reject all you want, Carl, but the fact remains that it is. You have taken the low road, while claiming the opposite. It is simply a term that refers in "shorthand" form to a panoply of falacies that are often cited as "reasons why we MUST keep Morse testing" ... none of which hold water and all of which have been rejected by the FCC. I have always presented well-reasoned, factual, and unemotional arguments in support of code testing. Please don't hold me up to the same light as those who may have transgressed in the manner which you refer to above. Above all, please remember that by far, the largest portion of the QRM in the code/no-code debate has been from the NCTA side. Also remember that as one who has never used the Morse/CW mode to an extent which would have allowed you to gain useful proficiency in the mode, you are not qualified to judge the value of this mode at all. I'm not sitting here trying to argue technical topics with you, so don't you try to tell me that the Morse/CW mode and testing aren't of value to the ARS. We are not on each other's respective levels of expertise. Since I'm more than willing to respect your technical expertise, don't presume to challenge my qualifications to make judgments about CW and code testing, because you don't know what your talking about. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |