Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote
But, did the FCC ever get anywhere close to seeing its use banned? I am not, remember, saying that a mode would become so unpopular or disliked on a scale such that it would be rare to find it openly being used. I am saying, however, that I believe the FCC would never regulate its ban. Spark transmissions were outlawed (as well they should have been) so the precedent exists. On a more immediate note, as relates to your discussion on AM phone, I'd have to dig out some old material to get all the facts exactly in order, but there was a petition (in the 70's?) which the I ***believe*** the FCC had moved to the stage of an NPRM to outlaw AM transmissions on the HF amateur bands. The rationale was that AM was (is?) wasteful of spectrum because SSB can convey the same message in half the bandwidth oF DSB AM phone and without those awful sounding hetrodyning carriers. The proposal narrowly missed being adopted, only because of a huge hue and cry from thousands of AM-forever hams (who drew ARRL into the fight on their side). Today you're hard pressed to find any remaining AM-ers on the band, and if the petition were re-introduced it might well be adopted due to lack of organized opposition. Most of the AM-forever crowd has moved to "forever". 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |