In article k.net, "Bill
Sohl" writes:


Another problem is that some (many?) that favor code testing suggest that
by ending that testing it will lead to an end to code use. I don't
belive that at all and there are hundreds of examples of older
technology and skills that are still practiced today in other
fields even though such technology/skill is recognized as
no longer generally used/needed (e.g. archery, manual transmission
autos, etc.)

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK

Bill:

One year ago, I traded in a perfectly good 2001 Toyota Corolla LE with
a 5-speed manual gearbox for a new 2003 model with an automatic
transmission. However, I still see the need for code testing in the ARS.
I own a few rifles and handguns, but wouldn't want to bet my life on my
proficiency with a compound bow. However, I still see the need for
code testing in the ARS. How do you explain that?

73 de Larry, K3LT