Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message thlink.net...
-- ô¿ô 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Help support youth involved in Amateur Radio. http://www.mnyarc.org http://www.k0bsa.org "N2EY" wrote In the early-to-mid 1970s, the Novice went through a period of quick changes. First, the FCC allowed folks who had been unlicensed for at least a year to get a Novice, regardless of prior licensure. This meant a ham could be a Novice forever - two years on, one year off, new callsign and license each time. Again the reason given was "too many dropouts". See my other post about "too many dropouts". Will do. Then the one-year-unlicensed requirement was dropped. And the reason given was... Finally the Novice was made 5 years renewable, like all the other license classes of the time. That was more than a quarter century ago. You're right, Jim, it was more than a quarter century ago. And over a quarter century ago FCC thought that 13 and 20 WPM code tests were a good idea, and a no-code license was a bad idea. And a lot of other things, like secret tests given by FCC examiners, extreme limits on vanity calls and repeaters, yada yada yada. Seems FCC no longer holds those views, so I think we can safely ignore your argument about what they thought back then on this matter also. That's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is to note that since that time, FCC has consistently made it *easier* and *more convenient* to get and keep an amateur radio license - of *any* class. As long as said changes mean less work for FCC, that is. That's been a consistent policy from then to now. Forced upgrading would go against that tide. One thing I'm not clear on, though. If an LP reached the end of the 10 years but couldn't pass the upgrade test, could they take the LP test and get another 10 years (as with driver's license LPs) or is it one-LP-to-a-customer, as the old Novice was? Do YOU think learners permits ought to be renewable beyond 10 years? I think *all* amateur licenses are essentially "permits to learn". And I think *all* classes of amateur license should be renewable. Just my opinion. If your proposed LP is going to allow all authorized modes on all authorized freqs from 1.8 MHz on up, it's going to need a rather considerable written test, doncha think? The power limit removes the need for lots of RF exposure and other safety questions, and the VE stuff, but what about almost all the rest? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote
One thing I'm not clear on, though. If an LP reached the end of the 10 years but couldn't pass the upgrade test, could they take the LP test and get another 10 years (as with driver's license LPs) or is it one-LP-to-a-customer, as the old Novice was? One to a customer. If you can't "get it" in 10 years, then you probably aren't going to be able to "get it" in 20 or 30 years. BTW, drivers license permits are not renewable here, although you can retest for a new one. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net, "KØHB"
writes: "N2EY" wrote One thing I'm not clear on, though. If an LP reached the end of the 10 years but couldn't pass the upgrade test, could they take the LP test and get another 10 years (as with driver's license LPs) or is it one-LP-to-a-customer, as the old Novice was? One to a customer. Understood. If you can't "get it" in 10 years, then you probably aren't going to be able to "get it" in 20 or 30 years. All depends what's going on in those 10 years. I know plenty of hams who were quite active until something significant happened in their lives like military service, a major illness in the family, marriage, divorce, children, relocation, new career, etc. Then, in accordance with "The Amateur Is Balanced", they put amateur radio on hold for anywhere from months to decades. Then, when their lives permitted, they came back in a big way. A few let their licenses lapse, but most kept renewing and modifying. Case in point: Amateur licensed in high school, got a bachelor's degree, worked a year or two, then decided to become a doctor. For the next 7 years his life was med school/residency/fellowship. Not a lot of time in there for ham radio, but he had an HT and kept in touch. And now he's an M.D. and hamming in a big way. His 10 years as a ham hit somewhere towards the end of medical school. Under today's rules, he just renewed and kept on going. Under your proposal, he would have lost his license and had to go all the way to Extra in one go if he ever wanted to be a ham again. Is that really what's best for the ARS? BTW, drivers license permits are not renewable here, although you can retest for a new one. Same deal here, AFAIK. So why not the same deal for hams? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article k.net, "KØHB" writes: "N2EY" wrote One thing I'm not clear on, though. If an LP reached the end of the 10 years but couldn't pass the upgrade test, could they take the LP test and get another 10 years (as with driver's license LPs) or is it one-LP-to-a-customer, as the old Novice was? One to a customer. Understood. If you can't "get it" in 10 years, then you probably aren't going to be able to "get it" in 20 or 30 years. All depends what's going on in those 10 years. I know plenty of hams who were quite active until something significant happened in their lives like military service, a major illness in the family, marriage, divorce, children, relocation, new career, etc. Then, in accordance with "The Amateur Is Balanced", they put amateur radio on hold for anywhere from months to decades. Then, when their lives permitted, they came back in a big way. A few let their licenses lapse, but most kept renewing and modifying. You can put me in that catagory from about 1961 until 1990 or so. I always renewed the license, sometimes subscribed and/or bought CG or QST, but was not on the air at all. Case in point: Amateur licensed in high school, got a bachelor's degree, worked a year or two, then decided to become a doctor. For the next 7 years his life was med school/residency/fellowship. Not a lot of time in there for ham radio, but he had an HT and kept in touch. And now he's an M.D. and hamming in a big way. His 10 years as a ham hit somewhere towards the end of medical school. Under today's rules, he just renewed and kept on going. Under your proposal, he would have lost his license and had to go all the way to Extra in one go if he ever wanted to be a ham again. Is that really what's best for the ARS? BTW, drivers license permits are not renewable here, although you can retest for a new one. Same deal here, AFAIK. So why not the same deal for hams? Works for me. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|