Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: Exactly, people won't produce things they can't make a profit on. More likely they simply can't produce those things. Thus it results in shortages and job losses leading to reduced buying power leading to layoffs in other industries and so on. Exactly. Even more recently, look at the mess that the electric power industry got into in parts of California some time back because of botched "deregulation". [snip] It's actually even more complex than that. Operating expenses are only one metric - there's also return on investment, market volatility, stock prices, regulatory controls, and a bunch of other factors. For example, suppose a business with a total investment of $1 million has $10 million in operating expenses and $100,000 in profits. Profit is 1% of operating expenses but 10% of investment - is this company on rocky ground or not? If the operating expenses are fairly fixed, even a small drop in sales will put the company in the red. But if the operating expenses rise and fall in sync with sales, the company may be in a very solid position, profit wise. There are all sorts of other examples. Some industries are so cyclic that they *need* high profits in good times to carry them through losses in bad times. I agree 100% but was just trying to keep it simple. It also illustrates that it it too complex to try to regulate as we've discussed below. There *is* a need for regulation of industry - we just have to be very careful as to how that regulation is done. For example, I don't think US companies should have to compete head-to-head with foreign companies whose managements don't have to worry about environmental rules, safety rules, child labor laws, etc. "Law of Unexpected Consequences" Look at the auto industry. Fuel prices were kept artificially low until the 1973 embargo, when they became artificially high, and the fuel itself became scarce. Because the market had become used to a semingly inexhaustible supply of cheap fuel, the US auto industry did not develop fuel-efficient cars, and transportation alternatives like transit died off (or were actively killed to get rid of the competition to the private auto). This shortsightedness set the stage for massive inroads in the US market by foreign carmakers who *had* developed fuel-efficient cars. Yup it sure did. I certainly remember when it seemed the roadways were dominated by foreign cars. In some ways they still are. Much of what we consider "American" cars are not 100% "Made in USA". In fact, many "foreign" cars have higher domestic content... In the past quarter century, my immediate family motor pool has included 2 Fords, 1 Saturn, 3 VWs, and 2 Hondas. All "Made in the USA". In addition, you have left out the most workable option. That is to work toward a world economy that enjoys a comparable standard to ours. Once that occurs, industry will find it more economical to produce more locally to trim shipping costs. Once it becomes equally costly to make a car in Japan as in the US for example, then the lower shipping cost means it's better to serve the US market with cars made in the US. In the case of cars, this has already happened in some cases. Many Japanese companies (Honda, Subaru, Toyota, to name just a few) make cars in the USA because it's cheaper! VW started that trend way back in the '70s by buying the Westmoreland, PA facility from Chrysler, and building Rabbits, Golfs and Jettas here instead of Germany. VW later sold that plant to Sony, who uses it to make CRTs (because it's cheaper to make them here!) The main drawback is the fact that it will take a very long time before the world standard of living matches ours. So what do we do until then? 73 de Jim, N2EY As people have always done: 1) Some will whine and barely get by. 2) Some will simply make the best of what they have and do a bit better 3) Others will forge ahead and strive for their own personal best development and productivity and will be reasonably comfortable. 4) Yet others will create an opportunity and become the next Bill Gates. I meant as a society. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large LOT Of NEW Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew |