Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim "
writes: "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message nk.net... As consumers, as Americans, we have to demand government manage the economy better (as I've previously outlined). This would be the ruination of the economy. The government is not, never has been, and never will be competent to manage the economy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE HERE HERE That's all well and good, but you're missing a plain, simple fact: You haven't defined what "manage the economy" means. If you define it as Soviet-style central economic planning, then almost anyone with any sense will agree that it's a recipe for economic disaster, as demonstrated by what happened in the USSR. (Largest country in the world, huge amounts of some of the best if not THE best farmland on earth, and after 70+ years of total control they can't even feed themselves?) But if you define it as "help things go well", it gets a lot murkier. For example, in the days following 9-11, the Feds helped out the airline industry in a big way with low interest loans. They were concerned that the loss of business in the wake of the events of that terrible day would have caused the collapse of several major airlines. Was that good management of the economy or not? Or look at your federal income taxes. Those of us who are home owners and who meet certain criteria can deduct home mortgage interest and real estate taxes on up to 2 residences. This effectively reduces the cost of buying/owning a home. Would you take that deduction away? Doing so would almost certainly slow down home sales and construction, and reduce property values all over the country. I'm old enough to remember when *all* consumer interest and sales taxes were deductible on your income taxes if certain criteria were met. That deduction pushed consumer spending because it reduced the effective cost of buying on time. It encouraged people to go into debt, particularly in inflationary times, because they could pay for today's fun with tomorrow's less-valuable dollars, *and* deduct the interest and tax costs. But those deductions were removed in order to "get the government off your back" (and pump more money into the coffers without 'raising' taxes). Or look where your taxes are spent. NASA's launch facilities for manned space flights are in Florida - because the orbital mechanics and safety considerations make Florida about the optimum place for a launch facility located in CONUS. But the manned flight center is in Houston Texas - because that's were LBJ was from. How many extra billions of dollars that contributed nothing to the space flight efforts have been spent over the decades because the two facilities are so far apart? No matter what the government does about the economy, the effects are widespread and have the effect, wanted or not, of "managing" the economy in some way or another. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large LOT Of NEW Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew |