Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24 Oct 2003 00:53:40 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:
Sounds like a decent set of rules. Put the actual bands down in a separate schedule, word it a little more formally, and write a petition to go with it. I'll support it. Sounds to me like the "comic book rules" (disguised as "plain language rules") that the scholars and wonders at the then-new Consumer Affairs Task Force of the FCC tried to institute in 1976 after their spectacular victory in rewriting Part 95 Subpart D (the CB Rules) in the same "lowest common denominator" (also known as "Illiteracy for Dummies") style. They tried running it up the flagpole and it was resoundingly shot down by both the professional regulators and the knowledgeable amateur community. The head of that operation - who up to that time had no idea of what and how the FCC was supposed to do for a living, much like the recent crop of appointees and promotees - then tried coming out to our field office and telling us how we were doing everything all wrong. In return, we requested that our Bureau Chief do all he could to ensure that those fools stayed out of our face and off our property in the future. The person running that operation got the same message from wherever she visited, and soon left the agency. "Those who will not learn from history will be doomed to repeat it...." -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |