Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
(snip) If one wants or needs to make other than local contacts then yes code is necessary. (snip) If the choice is to turn off the radio or use code then I'd say that code is indeed necessary whether or not it is an emergency. I think you missed the point. Other than the emergency or public services we offer, any contact whatsoever is an avocation, not a necessity. Therefore, any mode needed to facilitate that would also not be a necessity. If one wants to use code during those periods, one can do so by learning code on his/her own. It is not necessary for the goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service at this point to mandate that learning through a testing requirement. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |