| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
November 26th 03, 11:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message thlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote In fact, except for the most basic of rules and regulations, your argument leads to the inescapable conclusion that it is not necessary for the goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service at this point to mandate *any* learning through a testing requirement. Jim, If you want people to quit making fun of you, quit posting such laughable reductio ad absurdum arguments. 73, de Hans, K0HB (classic sour grapes) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||
Hybrid Mode
