Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
(snip) Hans thinks that *all* hams should be qualified (eventually) at at least the Extra class written level. The purpose of his proposed LP license is to give newbies a sample of what ham radio is like, and a 10-year opportunity to learn enough to get a full-privileges license. (snip) And I think Hans is barking up the wrong tree with his idea. I don't see any benefit whatsoever. It doesn't really serve a specific need within the Amateur Radio community. It doesn't serve the regulatory needs of the FCC. And it doesn't really serve the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio Service. Hans seems to be basing his idea on 97.1(c) and 97.1(d). The first talks about, "Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in both communications and technical phases of the art." The second talks about, "Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts." Neither of these even suggest the need for a requirement to advance in license class or get out. And neither suggests a need for a requirement to learn to a specific level or get out. Hans also seems to be basing his idea on the faulty premise that one must advance in license class to learn, advance skills, or increase the reservoir of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts. Of course, that premise is simply untrue. For example, one can learn about satellite communications, at least all that one can learn though Amateur Radio, with a Technician license (no license advancement required). The same with digital communications. The same with microwave communications. And the same with moonbounce, SSB, FM repeaters, and a long list of other skills, abilities, and radio arts. Finally, I think Hans' idea would have a chilling effect on the Amateur Radio Service - assigning newcomers (once again) to an outside the mainstream, subordinate, sub-class with sharp limits on their participation. If I took my first look at Amateur radio, and saw that as my only option, I would probably not so politely say where you could stick it. The 'advance or get out' idea would make that almost a certainty (indeed, why even invest time, or in radio equipment, if there is even the slightest possibility of being forced out of something I know so little about at that particular moment - a potential newcomer). Luckily, I think the FCC would have enough common sense to realize this idea is absurd. Sadly, it does seem to have it's supporters within the Amateur Radio community. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |