| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote: Morse code is uniquely necessary. (snip) Saying so doesn't make it true, Dee. Within the goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service, and to justify a unique testing requirement, how is Morse code uniquely necessary today? Do remember recreational use is not sufficient enough to justify a unique testing requirement (recreational use is equally applicable to all modes and they don't have a unique testing requirement). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||