Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
news ![]() "Kim W5TIT" wrote: Wow. Good point, Dwight. Maybe that idea of a term limitation license makes more sense than ever. I haven't been in favor of it...but maybe there's a part of it I haven't thought of, such as your comment above. Learning is one aspect of the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio Service, not the total sum. When discussing term limits on license class, all aspects of that should be considered. And, when it comes to those other aspects, there is no real benefit from term limits. Indeed, one could argue that it may actually harm those other things (reducing our overall numbers, for example). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Well, what I would support would be something like a pretty simple test--I mean darned simple--with a minimal operating privilege built in with it. At the end of something like a year or 2 years, then one would either have to upgrade with a more technical and knowledge-based test and a higher, permanent license class. I still would leave CW out of the mix, too... However, I don't think there's going to be any major changes to the licensing or testing structure for another couple of years. Jim, I think it was, had a thread going with the predictions of when CW would be taken out and I think I had a couple of years while others were guessing pretty quick. I think CW testing is here to stay for a while. Kim W5TIT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |