Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote And how are we going to take care of the "shack on a belt" crowd. A awful lot of hams are quite happy with their Technician licenses. And under my plan they are free to keep their Technician license. And new people that intend to operate in this fashiion will have a very different set up. A forced upgrade with absolutely no advantage for a person that only does public events, and uses the local repeater once in a while is not going to be very popular with them. I don't propose to force them to upgrade. Technicians are perfectly free to renew their current license. So you are saying that present licenses will continue with the ten year operating cycle? This is beginning to look like there will be 5 classes of license in the end. And of course, how ya gonna enforce that 50 watt limit? Enacting unenforceable laws is a great way to breed disrespect for laws. There are currently many examples of limited power in the rules. How do we enforce the current 50W limit which exists for EVERYONE on some HF frequencies? How do we enforce the current 200W limit in the Novice sub-bands? How did we enforce the old 75W limit for Novices? How did we enforce the old 50W limits on 160 meters? How do we enforce the current 200W limit on 30 meters? How do we enforce the 50W PEP limit on 219-220MHz? How do we enforce the current Novice 5W limit on 23 cm? How do we enforce the current 25W limit for Novices on 1.25 cm? As a matter of fact, how do we enforce the current 1.5KW limit? Are you suggesting that FCC discard all these limits because they breed disrespect? What a 'novel' idea!!!! (I quit using the word 'stupid'.) Just because an idea is bad, doesn't mean it isn't repeated, eh? BTW, you forgot ro add the ERP power limit on 60 meters. Rolling back the output power to 50 watts when most HF transcievers will do 100 watts is simply not going to work (if you want it to work that is) Perhaps it is just as easy to detect someone running at 100 watts as it is at 3kilowatts? But okay, perhaps you have the evidence of all the Technicians that have been injured by using 100 watts of RF power? What is the basis for 50 watts? Is it safety? Or is it arbitrary? - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |