Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: Hans K0HB wrote: Mike Coslo wrote What is the basis for 50 watts? NCRP Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields", Copyright 1986, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, and ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz", Copyright 1992, IEEE, Inc. Hans dropped in a nice bibliographic note but did NOT say HOW he arrived at his magical 50 W limit. :-) Way too many variables in the amateur radio "station" arrangement to say with some kind of certainty that 50 W is THE limit for any class. FCC already showed that with a survey of some typical California ham stations along with measurements of fields courtesy of a couple of other government agencies and the hams who let them all prowl around their property. And that 50 watts affects calss A different than Class B? I seriously doubt that a person that cannot handle 100 watts shild have any license. Maybe class A shouldn't be alloed to have antennas over 10 feet off the ground either. Nasy falls. 100 Watts in a 50 Ohm system has an RMS RF Voltage of 70.7. That's on the verge of burning human skin tissue. 50 Watts in a 50 Ohm system has 50 V RMS RF...still on the verge of burning human skin tissue, although not as badly. 100 W of RF is little, piddly stuff to what I'm used to...like 15 KW up- close-and-personal on HF, including walking around in antenna fields of many and varied HF emitters...and 40 KW PEP HF stuff in antenna fields in 1955. Most of us being personal with such powers weren't suffering ill effects and almost all of us weren't licensed in any "classes." We got the messages through. --------- For some really in-depth looks at radio frequency radiation, go to the Brooks AFB website and the documents at the USAF School of Aerospace Medicine. The following is the cover page for one of the shorter documents released in 1996: http://www.brooks.af.mil/afrl/HED/he...uman-exposure/ cover.gif.html That document title number is AL/OE-TR-1996-0035. It was prepared in 1994. Be prepared to do a little math to find the permissible RF field strengths...not much, just a little. There's also FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletins 56 and 65 available on the FCC RF Safety webpage. Only a few ANSI standards are free for download (if available), the same with the IEEE site. Maybe Hans will reveal what kind of aluminum suit he wears when he fires up his "2.5 KW with increased drive" HF amplifier. :-) LHA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |