LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 1st 03, 05:43 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"N2EY" wrote:

(snip) The idea isn't that they'll have a high
level of expertise right off, but that they'll reach
that level through the 'incentive' of having to
either upgrade or leave the air. (snip)



To me, the entire idea is a solution seeking a problem. Since I don't
think the current license holders are lacking, I don't see any real benefit
(and I don't think the FCC will either). Regardless, his proposal would
require a complete re-write of all the rules relating to license class, when
a single sentence added to the existing rules would accomplish virtually the
same thing - "All license holders, except Extra, must obtain the next higher
license class within five years of obtaining their current license." Another
sentence might describe what will happen if that doesn't occur.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 12:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 22nd 03 11:38 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 04:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017