Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote: (snip) I want added test material for the advanced licenses to fill the vacuum left by the departure of Morse Code testing. I don't want the additions as a way of keeping people out - indeed if there are some more questions, it is just a matter of studying a little more. I want it to show that we are not just getting rid of things, and thereby simply making things easier to get a ticket. (snip) Several have said that, but I just don't see what can be added that wouldn't fundamentality change the nature of the Amateur Radio Service. As I see it, this is an amateur activity designed with three basic goals in mind - provide some radio services to others (public service), some benefit to the participants (recreational radio activities), and a mild introduction to the field of electronics. Since the first two (and international goodwill) don't seem to be a consideration, I'll ignore those for now. This leaves the last and a question about how far that should be taken. Most are not clear at all about that. Some seem to suggest we add content to more closely fit a college degree program. If so, do we add science, history, social studies, general math, politics, language, art, economics, health, and the other things colleges require? If not, can we honestly claim the license is comprehensive training? But if we add those things, what happens to the avocational nature of this activity? I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote
I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote:
Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." Very funny, Hans. However, as previously stated, I have no interest in getting the General at this time. In fact, I'm not even that active with my current license. I've looked over the license tests several times over the last few years, the most recent to was when the tests were redone to see if any significant changes were made. Only one situation might immediately cause me to consider a new license class - if there was a possibility for us to go overseas again for a length of time where getting another license would be difficult. In that case, I would get a General, and perhaps even the Extra, in case I might want that capability while overseas. Other than that, my interest in the other license classes will probably not go beyond casual curiosity anytime soon. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net... "Dwight Stewart" wrote I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB "Hammer, meet nail." I don't even think we need to change the questions. Eliminate the published Q&A pools and reorder the answers, that'll do it. Q. Do what? A. Require just a hair more cerebral activity than rote memorization. 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Craig wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "Dwight Stewart" wrote I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB "Hammer, meet nail." When you're only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail! 8^) I don't even think we need to change the questions. Eliminate the published Q&A pools and reorder the answers, that'll do it. Big deal! There will have to be a study guide, which will have the answers in it in text form. I'd read it and know it. Probably quicker and better than the pools BTW, Bert, did you know that they change the order of the answers in the actual test as compared to the question pool? Q. Do what? A. Require just a hair more cerebral activity than rote memorization. Maybe for some. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
... Bert Craig wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "Dwight Stewart" wrote I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB "Hammer, meet nail." When you're only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail! 8^) Lol. I don't even think we need to change the questions. Eliminate the published Q&A pools and reorder the answers, that'll do it. Big deal! There will have to be a study guide, which will have the answers in it in text form. I'd read it and know it. Probably quicker and better than the pools I'd bet you would too. I had a slightly unfair advantage, a college avionics curriculum that culminated in a GROL. However, in order to earn our sheepskins, we had to pass screening exams...no published Q&A pools. Same applied to our FAA exams. BTW, Bert, did you know that they change the order of the answers in the actual test as compared to the question pool? Didn't really notice. Once you review the Q&A pool, the correct answer stands out like a sore thumb. I reviewed the Q&A pool twice and drove and hour so to Yonkers, NY...for approx. six minutes of actual exam time. (& that gave me privies to 1500 Watts on 50 MHz and up?!) Q. Do what? A. Require just a hair more cerebral activity than rote memorization. Maybe for some. You're right, maybe. - Mike KB3EIA - 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Craig wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bert Craig wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net... "Dwight Stewart" wrote I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB "Hammer, meet nail." When you're only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail! 8^) Lol. I don't even think we need to change the questions. Eliminate the published Q&A pools and reorder the answers, that'll do it. Big deal! There will have to be a study guide, which will have the answers in it in text form. I'd read it and know it. Probably quicker and better than the pools I'd bet you would too. I had a slightly unfair advantage, a college avionics curriculum that culminated in a GROL. However, in order to earn our sheepskins, we had to pass screening exams...no published Q&A pools. Same applied to our FAA exams. BTW, Bert, did you know that they change the order of the answers in the actual test as compared to the question pool? Didn't really notice. Once you review the Q&A pool, the correct answer stands out like a sore thumb. I reviewed the Q&A pool twice and drove and hour so to Yonkers, NY...for approx. six minutes of actual exam time. (& that gave me privies to 1500 Watts on 50 MHz and up?!) Reminds me of the first time I took the General test. I got up early and drove to the Hamfest in Butler PA from State College PA. Drank several cups of coffee on the way. I took the writtens first, and no problem acing it. Then the combination of the trip and too much coffee kicked in as I sat down for the Morse code test. As they say in the Bronx fuggitaboudit! So I had to wait a while for my ticket. Which makes me wonder, I do not do Morse well under stress. I wonder how some of those who had to do it under some awful condx ever managed. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
t... Bert Craig wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bert Craig wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net... "Dwight Stewart" wrote I've looked over the current written tests. I just don't see where they're lacking as far as the existing goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service are concerned. Translation: "After over 6 years as a Technician, I've almost got the General Class test memorized. Don't set me back by making me memorize a whole different set of questions." 73, de Hans, K0HB "Hammer, meet nail." When you're only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail! 8^) Lol. I don't even think we need to change the questions. Eliminate the published Q&A pools and reorder the answers, that'll do it. Big deal! There will have to be a study guide, which will have the answers in it in text form. I'd read it and know it. Probably quicker and better than the pools I'd bet you would too. I had a slightly unfair advantage, a college avionics curriculum that culminated in a GROL. However, in order to earn our sheepskins, we had to pass screening exams...no published Q&A pools. Same applied to our FAA exams. BTW, Bert, did you know that they change the order of the answers in the actual test as compared to the question pool? Didn't really notice. Once you review the Q&A pool, the correct answer stands out like a sore thumb. I reviewed the Q&A pool twice and drove and hour so to Yonkers, NY...for approx. six minutes of actual exam time. (& that gave me privies to 1500 Watts on 50 MHz and up?!) Reminds me of the first time I took the General test. I got up early and drove to the Hamfest in Butler PA from State College PA. Drank several cups of coffee on the way. I took the writtens first, and no problem acing it. Then the combination of the trip and too much coffee kicked in as I sat down for the Morse code test. As they say in the Bronx fuggitaboudit! So I had to wait a while for my ticket. Which makes me wonder, I do not do Morse well under stress. I wonder how some of those who had to do it under some awful condx ever managed. - Mike KB3EIA - I actually had a pretty good experience with Element 1...once it began. I had actually kinda over-prepped and was getting pretty nervous. Dick, N0BK (God rest his soul.) told me to stop practicing, get off my ar$e, and just give it a whirl. When I arrived, it was all I could do NOT to throw up, until the code characters started flowing. I had practiced with the ARRL CD's and they turned out to be a tad faster than the actual exam. It was like gettin' ready to bat in the world series only to have the pitcher throw cantaloupe sized balls in slow-motion...underhand. I went into immediate $hit-eating grin mode. Then there's gettin' OTA...whole 'nutha story. ;-) 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:54:25 GMT, Mike Coslo wrote:
Which makes me wonder, I do not do Morse well under stress. I wonder how some of those who had to do it under some awful condx ever managed. I was at a hearing once where a shipboard operator was accused of slugging the captain in the radio room. The other operator on duty was being questioned as a witness, and was asked "did you see or hear Mr. X have a fist-fight with the captain?". His reply: "when I sit and copy the telegraph code that's all I concentrate on". Not being a "morseman" as others call it, I admire someone who can do that sort of concentration. (I've done it on 'phone, though.) -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... [snip] Reminds me of the first time I took the General test. I got up early and drove to the Hamfest in Butler PA from State College PA. Drank several cups of coffee on the way. I took the writtens first, and no problem acing it. Then the combination of the trip and too much coffee kicked in as I sat down for the Morse code test. As they say in the Bronx fuggitaboudit! So I had to wait a while for my ticket. Which makes me wonder, I do not do Morse well under stress. I wonder how some of those who had to do it under some awful condx ever managed. - Mike KB3EIA - Those who can hold it together under stress come in two types: a - nerves of steel (only a few of those around) OR b - they've done it so long that it's no more stressful than talking (probably the more common reason). Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |