"Hans K0HB" wrote:

(snip) But I am also recommending, after
a generous period with 'training wheels',
a more strenuous qualification for
standard privileges than currently exists.
The QCAO and IOoDHW cries of "the
unfairness of it all" are deafening.


The only thing I've heard is cries for proof that your license proposal
actually addresses a real need within the Amateur Radio Service - something
that fits the goals and purposes of that. What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/