Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 03, 01:39 AM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dwight Stewart" wrote

What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.


Stewart, there's no polite way for me to say this. With your QCAO agenda so
thoroughly clouding your thought processes, you wouldn't recognize proof if
Mr. Proof in a monogrammed sweater jumped out of your computer screen and
bit you square on the nose. So you cling to your "unfairness" and
"unenforceable" jeremiads, even though they have both been refuted and
discredited here with elementary logic.

The beauty of the situation is that I don't have to prove anything to you
anyhow. I just have to persuade the FCC. ('Oh dear,' says God, 'I hadn't
thought of that,' and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic. -- Douglas
Adams, THGttG)


With kindest personal regards,

de Hans, K0HB




  #2   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 03, 06:48 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article et, "KØHB"
writes:

"Dwight Stewart" wrote

What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.


Stewart, there's no polite way for me to say this. With your QCAO agenda so
thoroughly clouding your thought processes, you wouldn't recognize proof if
Mr. Proof in a monogrammed sweater jumped out of your computer screen and
bit you square on the nose. So you cling to your "unfairness" and
"unenforceable" jeremiads, even though they have both been refuted and
discredited here with elementary logic.


WHAT "logic" heap big chief?

All you've done so far is to ISSUE ORDERS OF THE DAY. No "logic,"
simply a set of demands which are labeled "TRUTH."

The beauty of the situation is that I don't have to prove anything to you
anyhow. I just have to persuade the FCC.


Fine. Convince the Commission you are god.

I'll be waiting, heap big chief. :-)

LHA

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 01:56 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article et, "KØHB"
writes:

"Dwight Stewart" wrote

What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.


Stewart, there's no polite way for me to say this. With your QCAO agenda so
thoroughly clouding your thought processes, you wouldn't recognize proof if
Mr. Proof in a monogrammed sweater jumped out of your computer screen and
bit you square on the nose. So you cling to your "unfairness" and
"unenforceable" jeremiads, even though they have both been refuted and
discredited here with elementary logic.


WHAT "logic" heap big chief?


Power levels have been set by the FCC for decades. Perhaps you can
adequately logical reasons why such would be considered unfair or
unenforceable, kinly old gent.

All you've done so far is to ISSUE ORDERS OF THE DAY. No "logic,"
simply a set of demands which are labeled "TRUTH."


I must have missed the demands part, Len. Why not clarify it for us?

The beauty of the situation is that I don't have to prove anything to you
anyhow. I just have to persuade the FCC.


Fine. Convince the Commission you are god.

I'll be waiting, heap big chief. :-)


....not on the ham bands, you won't. You aren't involved in amateur
radio.

Dave K8MN
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 03, 07:09 PM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"KØHB" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote

What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.


(snip) So you cling to your "unfairness" and
"unenforceable" jeremiads, even though they
have both been refuted and discredited here
with elementary logic.

The beauty of the situation is that I don't have
to prove anything to you anyhow. I just have
to persuade the FCC. (snip)



Considering your nonsense about QCAO, negative comments about Technicians,
the lack of any valid reason for your proposal, the lack of any evidence
supporting your claims, and so forth, I think your real intent was proven
very nicely. If you've offered the same to the FCC, I suspect they will just
as easily see through your proposal.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 3rd 03, 07:40 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

KØHB wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote


What you've offered so far has
certainly not provided that proof.



Stewart, there's no polite way for me to say this. With your QCAO agenda snip



I'm almost afraid to ask, Hans. What is QCAO?

- Mike KB3EIA -



  #6   Report Post  
Old December 6th 03, 06:25 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Coslo" wrote

I'm almost afraid to ask, Hans. What is QCAO?


Quarter Century Appliance Operators club, sorta like the QCWA (Quarter
Century Wireless Association). See press release below.

73, de Hans, K0HB


-----------------------------------------------------------------
News Release:

QCAO Reorganizes

-----------------------------------------------------------------

The Quarter Century Appliance Operators was founded in the
early 1950's by a small group of Amateur Radio operators from
the Pacific Northwest. They had been active in their hobby for
over 25 years, yet still lacked the basic knowledge of radio
electronics and had no idea of how their equipment worked.

They banded together to try and protect each others honor
and pride. At radio gatherings and club meetings in the 1950s
one was considered unworthy of the name Ham Radio Operator if
he or she couldn't not only name components, but know how to
solder them together and make a radio work, or fix a broken set!

When faced with insults and dreision, those few hardy
pioneers banded together and formed the First Chapter and
National Organization of the QCAO. This was known as the "Cold
Solder" Chapter. They even coined the now-famous club byword
"e pluribus ignoramae" which is Latin for "We don't have to know
how to solder, we just wanna talk on our radios."

No veterans of that first chapter are known to be active on
the air today. In the late 1950s and early '60s, with the
worldwide interest in science and space and technology, the QCAO
membership went underground.

It is with great pride and dignity that today in the 21st Century
the revived QCAO stands ready to rise from the ashes, and become
the standard of mediocrity it once proudly was. In honor of
those first pioneering members, QCAO hereby invites all eligible
applicants to step forward and join!

The benefits of QCAO include not only the pride of
membership. Think of the warm glow you will feel at club
meetings and gatherings showing off your new all-plastic
imprinted QCAO pocket protector! And that's not all! For your
minimal membership fee, you will also receive a handsome,
suitable-for-framing, certificate of honor, with hand-lettered
name and Charter Membership Number. Other QCAO memorabilia
will soon be available for members, including T-shirts, caps,
pins, etc. At this date charter membership numbers are still
available. Membership requires a 25 years (more or less)
interest in Amateur Radio, coupled with a basic ignorance of how
radios work and how to repair them.

Think of meeting other QCAO members on the air! No more
embarrassing pauses when someone in the QSO mentions an RF choke
or a parasitic bleeder...Be able to exchange meaningful sharing,
talk about real things, yes, even swap QCAO numbers with each
other! And soon perhaps . . . a worldwide QCAO contest!

You no longer have to shrink to the back of the room at post-
meeting sessions of your radio club. Just display your QCAO
protector and others will be able to identify you immediately.
Who knows? Perhaps one of the originals from that old QCAO
Chapter is just waiting for you to find him. Join now! Remember
"We don't have to know how to solder, we just wanna talk on our
radios"! Don't let technoids embarrass you and kick jargon in
your face. Stand up for what's right! Join QCAO!

"e pluribus ignoramae"


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 12:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 22nd 03 11:38 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 04:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017