Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
But even if that is the case, it would seem to me to make more sense to us a limit that is easily handled by virtue of equipment that will handle the limit already on the market. Exisitng equipment could still be used by LP licensees - they just have to turn it down by 3 dB. Would the manufacturers make equipment that only put out 50 watts? Possibly, but what will be the resale value of the equipment? So the new Class A ham has to go out and buy a new rig to make use of his or her new priveliges? Remember not everyone wants to run a lot of power. 100 watts is something most people are comfortable with. When the Novice was created back in 1951, the power limit was 75 watts input. Which works out to about 50 watts output. In a short time there were many manufacturers making transmitters for the Novice market. Their resale value was good because there were always new Novices coming along looking for a bargain. And those manufacturers had to compete with homebrew and surplus rigs which were in abundance back then. (One of the reasons Novices were limited to 75 w xtal control was so that homebrew rigs used by Novices would be kept simple). In fact many Novices used less than the full power allowed. Let's see...there was the Ameco AC-1, the Heath AT-1, DX-20, DX-35, DX-40, d DX-60 and HW-16, the Johnson Adventurer, Challenger, Navigator and Ranger, the Drake 2-NT, the Hallicrafters HT-40.......to name just a few. And this was when the amateur radio market was a lot smaller than it is today. And the rationale for the reduction of power needs to be proven to me anyway. How many Technicians have been hurt by using more than 50 watts power? Under Hans' plan, no existing hams would lose any privileges. So they don't have to worry. And do you think that the prospective ham should not know about RF safety until they reach the equivalent of an Extra? This plan seems to advocate that. Until a few years ago there were no questions about RF exposure at all in the pools. One question is being overlooked, though: Why are most manufactured rigs rated 100 watts? Why not 50 watts, or 250 watts, or something else? (A very few are rated at other power levels). Why 100. The answer is about 50 years old. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |