Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes: "KØHB" wrote: I have no agenda. Sure you do, Hans. Aren't you promoting an alternative licensing system with stiffer tests for newcomers? This points to an obvious reason why you would focus on the "electronics expert" portion of 97.1(d) while ignoring the rest. Sounds like Hans is promoting a "BAA" (Bachelor of Amateur Arts) degree diploma in lieu of a license. :-) BAA...say I. :-) (snip) it lacks any foundation of credibility when you consider that the successful applicant for *any* amateur license is authorized to build his own station. (snip) The key word is authorized, not expected, required, obligated, compelled, obliged, or whatever. A person can build radio equipment if he or she wants, but there is no mandate to do so. Incorrect, Dwight. There MUST be a MANDATE to conform to the wishes of the "QCAO" and their needs to be the CONTROLLING elements in amateur radio activities. In this case, "option IS a failure." MANDATE. Control. Issue orders. Comply. Conform. LHA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |