Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article et, "KØHB" writes: "Mike Coslo" wrote POINT B ------------ That particular power level has a real purpose. The purpose is two-fold. Well, if YOU said it, it must have a "real purpose." :-) Purpose #1) It allows us to institute a "learners permit" class of license in which we can limit power to a level which FCC has stated is safe for both the user and unknowing passers-by. What do you mean "we," white man? He added "unknowing passers-by". That pretty well covers you. I think you think you think more than the OET and the IEEE and the USAF and the ANSI. Purpose #2) It allows us to institute a "learners permit" class of license in which the power level minimizes the unwanted side-effects of granting broad spectrum access to relatively underqualified operators. Now, before you spin up your rotors about "but QRP operators work around the world", bear in mind that most of the "bad" signals heard on HF are the result of ignorant operators trying to run a lot of power, and the consequent splatter, flat-topping, birdies, over-compression, etc. On the other hand, I've never heard a distorted or crappy QRP station. In further support of the idea is the fact that all these 100W-class rigs you keep harping on are running at near their designed-in upper capability, making them more likely to become purveyors of all the crappy-signal symptoms I just talked about. At 50W they are much less likely to be straining their design specifications and consequently radiating cleaner signals. In the hands of even a QCAO life-member it would be hard to splatter/chirp/over-modulate when you're running at half the design limit of the rig. Of course. A "learner's permit." As if the ONLY radio emitters in the world came from amateur radio stations. :-) A learner's permit for amateur radio to be used in the pursuit of amateur radio. You know, it's one of those things in life of which you are not a part. Geez...for a work manager supposedly with a degree you sure don't know much about equipment that can go wrong, be misadjusted, and lots of other little nasties lurking inside electronics boxes. Tsk, tsk. "In the hands of you QCAO members," the "expertise" in radio matters went out the window if you think that RF power output is the ONLY thing causing splatter/chirp/over-modulation (etc.). Without RF power output, you wouldn't notice it, Len :-) :-) Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |