Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
Depending on when someone gets their Extra, they may have taken as many as 5 separate written tests (snip) Of course, Jim. However, I was under the impression we were talking about the present (the three written tests). "Similar difficulty" doesn't mean the same material. Obviously a lot of the basics would be covered in the Class B. (snip) I've looked over the existing exams and there isn't a lot of repeated material. By the way, are the "Class B" operators going to be prohibited from building their own equipment also? If not, how would one really make the test simplier? And with the simplified structure, some of the questions like subbands-by-license-class would go away. (snip) So we're now going to restructure the sub-bands also? This whole thing is getting more absurd with each message posted. Related question for Hans: Would existing Extras get Class A licenses automatically, or would they have to retest? Oh, you know Extras are going to be grandfathered into the new license structure, Jim. Hans has no intention of messing with his fellow, perfect as is, Extras (just the rest of the ham community). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |