Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et, "KØHB"
writes: "N2EY" wrote Related question for Hans: Would existing Extras get Class A licenses automatically, or would they have to retest? My inclination would be for current Extras to remain Extras unless they took the new test. The FCC would not dare to do anything to alter the "status" of current Amateur Extra-class licensees, particularly those who attained that class in the Pre-Restructuring Era. We've already made it to the top, under a significantly more comprehensive and challenging set of testing requirements, including Morse code tests at speeds up to 20 WPM. Uncle Charlie won't muck around with that, considering it is the white-hot resentment of the General-class licensees of the Pre-Incentive Licensing Era which started the whole debate over licensing standards in the first place. Had the FCC taken the simple precaution of "grandfathering" those hams to the then-new Extra class, we may not be having this debate now. Lots of guys (Larry comes to mind) attach a certain cachet to their current license, having "done it the old way". I've no problem with honoring that. The truth be known, I give relatively little thought to the fact that I am the holder of an Amateur Extra-class license. About the only time I've ever brought up the subject was to turn up the heat on the whining no-coders. The hardest license class for me to achieve was my Novice, which only came after 14 years wasted in my unwillingness to knuckle down and learn the Morse code. Once I overcame that personal character flaw, everything fell into place with surprising ease. As far as "honoring" Extra-class amateurs who did it "the old way" is concerned, that would probably not be an issue except for the previously mentioned Inceltive Licensing debacle, and the fact that CB Radio had the effect of "consumerizing" personal radio communications to the point where a demand was created for that capability. Now, in these days of cell phones and "wireless" digital everything, amateur radio itself is all but irrelevant. So, in a way, I guess there may now be some point in "honoring" those of us who reached the pinnacle of the amateur radio licensing structure, under the "old order" set of standards. Perhaps it could serve to show newer hams what they have lost in the sense of true status attained, and the good feeling of individual accomplishment that it brings. This may possibly cause the trend to again reverse itself, and create a demand for a return to a set of licensing standards which reward increased knowledge and operating skills with greater operating privileges. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |