Ejaculation is not required for a conviction. When it comes to children,
even inappropriate fondling or touching is illegal.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Rumor has it MJ is also a No Code CBplusser. I wonder if he is an NCI Member?

"white rover" wrote:

What parents in there right minds would still
send their children up to Netherlamds after
the first court case?


Were you watching Fox television yesterday? They had a woman on who is
still planning to send her son to sleep over with Jackson, even after all
that has happened over the last few days. Don't ask me why she would do it.
I have absolutely no idea why anyone would do something that stupid.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

(WA8ULX) wrote in
:

Ejaculation is not required for a conviction. When it comes to
children, even inappropriate fondling or touching is illegal.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Rumor has it MJ is also a No Code CBplusser. I wonder if he is an NCI
Member?


You go too far. Plonk.

I'm a no code tech and a Michael Jackson fan too. don't be mean to my hero.

In article , WA8ULX says...

Ejaculation is not required for a conviction. When it comes to children,
even inappropriate fondling or touching is illegal.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

Rumor has it MJ is also a No Code CBplusser. I wonder if he is an NCI Member?

i wish i could sleep over jackos house.

In article .net, Dwight
Stewart says...

"white rover" wrote:

What parents in there right minds would still
send their children up to Netherlamds after
the first court case?


Were you watching Fox television yesterday? They had a woman on who is
still planning to send her son to sleep over with Jackson, even after all
that has happened over the last few days. Don't ask me why she would do it.
I have absolutely no idea why anyone would do something that stupid.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

Dwight Stewart wrote:

Is there anyone out there who actually believes Michael Jackson is really
innocent of this latest charge?

Don't know, wasn't there.....

There is a long list of questionable
behavior that suggests otherwise - his "relationship" with 14 year old Brook
Shields (including at least one date to a Hollywood awards ceremony), rumors
of sleeping in bed with children, music videos targeting children with
images of him grabbing his crotch, a multi-million dollar payoff of a family
with similar accusations, admissions of sleeping in bed with children, an
interview showing a 13 year old boy leaning against him like some kind of
lover, and now these accusations.

Two possibilities: he's molesting kids, and thus guilty, or
he just likes the (non molesting) company of kids. But not smart enough
to avoid getting "shaken down" by unscrupulous people. He should
have just played with the kids in the amusement park, in the living room,
and such, in the presence of their parents and other responsible adults
and not let the kids into the bedroom.

Anyway, I thought he looked better being black....

Does he have a ham license?

N8WWM wrote:

i wish i could sleep over jackos house.

Too old?

- Mike KB3EIA -

I'm a no code tech and a Michael Jackson fan too. don't be mean to my hero.


Are all you CBplussers like MJ?

I can't speak for all of them. Whats not to like?

In article , WA8ULX says...

I'm a no code tech and a Michael Jackson fan too. don't be mean to my hero.


Are all you CBplussers like MJ?

I can't speak for all of them. Whats not to like?


Yea thats what I thought.