Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
Nope, you are incorrect. I don't care whether you agree with me or not. It is when you start telling me things that depict the nature of a personality *because* of something I am saying that you'll see me pushing back in like manner. Well, that doesn't always come across so clearly in what you post in the newsgroup. We can't read your mind, only your words. And, in those words, I often see you giving as much as you get. Larry does like to throw punches at you, but I've seen you throw a few at him too. At this point, which one started first is somewhat hard to determine. Instead, most simply go with whatever is being said at the moment. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#132
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote:
Michael Jackson Jokes Q: How do you know when it's bedtime at the Jackson residence? A: When the big hand touches the little hand... Oh, my. Sick. Discusting. Horrible. Funny!! Thanks, Ryan. A copy is now on my hard drive. I'm sure my wife will get a laugh out of some of them too. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#133
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart wrote: Well, gee, Dave. If people are going to run around wearing a single glove for decoration, there has to be some rules of etiquette. I just have to wonder what Ms. Manners would say about all this. "ICK"? Yep. That about covers it. :-) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#134
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
Oooo, I know. I sure am getting short with people lately. Y'know why, I think? It's kind of like all those who are nearly always as good as we can possibly be--at the *expense* of ourselves around all the creeps in this world. I am getting tired of it--and I ain't takin' it no more... Yea, but, if you're going to declare war, you're supposed to fly the "Don't Tread On Me" flag or something first. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#135
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
hlink.net... "Kim W5TIT" wrote: Nope, you are incorrect. I don't care whether you agree with me or not. It is when you start telling me things that depict the nature of a personality *because* of something I am saying that you'll see me pushing back in like manner. Well, that doesn't always come across so clearly in what you post in the newsgroup. We can't read your mind, only your words. And, in those words, I often see you giving as much as you get. Larry does like to throw punches at you, but I've seen you throw a few at him too. At this point, which one started first is somewhat hard to determine. Instead, most simply go with whatever is being said at the moment. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ The key phrase up there, Dwight, is: "give as much as you get." That is why I said I will push back in like manner. Kim W5TIT |
#136
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kim W5TIT" wrote: Ask an English professor, Dwight. Writing is something I greatly enjoy, Kim. As written, your sentence, without the reference to others, basically says "it's a pretty near given that I would find anything like the death of someone else "hilarious."" Clearly, something else is needed to change that to fit your intent (for example, "...I would NOT find..."). With your reference to others, the missing "neither" is necessary (the basic "neither/nor" grammar rule, as in "neither I nor others would find"). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#137
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
ACK!!! Man, I am still stunned over this one--I *must* be getting old. The grammar department indeed reminded me of the old "either/neither" "neither/nor" argument to be used in deciding upon correct grammar! So, yes, Larry was correct! Wow, what a hoot! Larry being correct Big Evil Grin. (snip) Ah, I see you've already figured it out. Ignore my last message. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#138
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kim W5TIT wrote:
a whole bunch snipped Well, as I've been doing this more and more over the past 5-6 months or so, I am also noticing that there are others doing this. I don't know that it's always been done by others and I've just never noticed, but I notice that there *are* others who are doing it. I am refreshed by that. I am tired of always being the friendly, patient, kind one--just to keep getting stepped on by the creeps... Well, we can all react to the world as we wish. I find that a rude reaction to rudity just validates all the rudity. Of course we can't be all well mannered all the time, but IMO, its best to try. Grace is a habit. And the best revenge is living well. Illegitemi non Carborundum! |
#139
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: Hmmm, not only no, but hell no. I can be treaded on all "they" want. I've declared war on the road, tell ya that. I travel a good number of miles to work. And, it's so bad "out there" that when I do 70-75 (in a 60 zone), there will be creeps that pull up behind me and start this moving to the left so they're on the shoulder and can see the traffic around the front of me; or flashing their headlights so I'll move outta "their" way; or pulling up so close that all I see of their lights behind me is a halo because they're only about 2' distance from my rear bumper. What lane are you in when they do this? Or, they'll do the ultimate stupidity and pass then pull into the spot that I have created in front of me so that they can start leapfrogging from one lane to the next. Well, used to be I'd move. No more. I sit right there. And, they still go around but now I creep up just ever so slightly (still maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front of me) and see if they'll still dare slide in. Well, sometimes they do. So, since they've usually been behind me flashing their headlights, I'll go the lazy man's route and just leave mine on high beam--and I've got some bright lights. And if an accident occurs, you'll hit them, and the judgement may be that it was *your* fault! I go on the "Duel" philosophy (from the old TV movie by Speilberg): I'd rather have a nutcase driver in front of me, where I can watch him/her, than behind me. I've actually pulled over and let 'em go by rather than have them follow me. Then, there's the folks in the store. You'll know who I'm talking about here. The folks who walk up behind you and have a couple of things in their hands and start practically doing calisthenics (sp) to careen in front of you so you'll see they only have a couple of things and let them go ahead. I haven't encountered that yet. Must be a Texas thing... Used to do that, too. No more. It's my turn dammit and they can wait. Now, don't get me wrong: if I happen to turn to one side or the other and I notice someone patiently waiting their turn, I let them go ahead. But these creeps who think that they are entitled to getting around just because they are far more important than anyone else...nope, not doin' it any more. And, depending upon how showy they are about how important they are is how slow I am to slowly unload my cart, slowly find my checkbook, confirm the price however many times it needs confirming, very carefully write my check, etc. I use a different approach completely in stores. I call it the CQT (Cuteness Queueing Theory) method. Works like this: Whenever you're in a store that has two or more checkout lines, choose which line to be in by how attractive/cute/sexy/whatever the checkout person is. Doesn't matter how long the line is - get in the line with the checkout person you find most attractive. For some reason, that line always seems to move the fastest. Or, the teeny-bopper eh-heh couple that thinks everyone wants to see them practically making love in public. If we are all in a line at a store or something and I see another person who is as dismayed by this as me, I'll say something like, "thank goodness for birth control." The other person will usually say something back (having just *waited* for the opportunity) like, "doesn't look like they use it." Or some such thing. For some reason, *that* is when these creeps get embarrassed. I like that! Here's another, copied from the "Seinfeld" episode, but you have to be with your SO to do it. Simply start talking all sweet to each other (the episode had Jerry and his girlfriend calling each other "schmoopie"). Folks of our age look ancient to many kids that age, and when we behave that way it drives them nuts. Of course, it takes some discipline to keep a straight face while calling each other "Bunny" and "Huggybear" and such, plus you hafta have the right person with you to do it at all. Then, there's what I call the "buddy" creeps. The philosophy is to shop in pairs and have one stand in line while the other keeps going back and getting things that were "forgotten." And, the one standing in line will keep turning and saying please excuse us...giggle. I used to just throw a fake smile. Not any more. Now I say, "no, I won't excuse you, you are holding all of us up here and it's rude and inconsiderate of you." I don't mind a thing or two, but after that it's a different story. And restaurants. Oh my goodness how many times have you been at an eatery, only to have some creep's misbehaving little future creep keep popping up over the booth seat to let out a shrill of a scream with laughter right behind--over and over and over again...or let the little tyrant run rampant while the beautiful couple (yeah right) sits and eats in peace while their monster runs to every table standing there like you're supposed to applaud them or something. I used to grin and bear that, too. Now, I get up, and I'll actually say something to the parents about how disruptive their "child" (term used loosely) is being to everyone else's table--so can I sit at theirs. That one there gets real sneers. Ask me if I care. They don't, I ain't gonna. Fortunately I haven't run into that very much. Yet. Well, as I've been doing this more and more over the past 5-6 months or so, I am also noticing that there are others doing this. I don't know that it's always been done by others and I've just never noticed, but I notice that there *are* others who are doing it. I am refreshed by that. I am tired of always being the friendly, patient, kind one--just to keep getting stepped on by the creeps... Maybe we've all had it... grin One can be assertive without being nasty, though. It sure sounds like people are in one heck of a hurry down there, though... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#140
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problem... a little laughter is a good thing once in a while. Had to do
a little cleanup with the file, due to some F words etc..... Ryan "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message hlink.net... "Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote: Michael Jackson Jokes Q: How do you know when it's bedtime at the Jackson residence? A: When the big hand touches the little hand... Oh, my. Sick. Discusting. Horrible. Funny!! Thanks, Ryan. A copy is now on my hard drive. I'm sure my wife will get a laugh out of some of them too. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Michael Jackson Innocent? Is KE4TEW a father of felons? YES | General | |||
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew | |||
FS:NOS JACKSON BROS. 2-Section Air Variables w/pics | Homebrew |