Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: William wrote: Mark, you must first understand the mind of Heil and Heil apologists. You left out "his running dogs and lackeys". Incorrect...YOU are here... After re-reading Brian's statement and my response, your comment makes no sense whatever. Dave K8MN |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: After re-reading Brian's statement and my response, your comment makes no sense whatever. Poor baby. Another with intellectual presbyopia. Tsk, tsk. |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: After re-reading Brian's statement and my response, your comment makes no sense whatever. Poor baby. Another with intellectual presbyopia. Tsk, tsk. |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote: William wrote: Mark, you must first understand the mind of Heil and Heil apologists. You left out "his running dogs and lackeys". Incorrect...YOU are here... In article , Dave Heil writes: After re-reading Brian's statement and my response, your comment makes no sense whatever. Poor baby. Another with intellectual presbyopia. Tsk, tsk. I had no idea that's what you were diagnosed with, Len. I'm awfully sorry. I should have realized that there was something behind these seemingly senseless outbursts of yours. I did you a favor and re-inserted the part you snipped. If you look at the whole thing, perhaps it'll become clear to you how you made your error. Dave K8MN |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: Len Over 21 wrote: William wrote: Mark, you must first understand the mind of Heil and Heil apologists. You left out "his running dogs and lackeys". Incorrect...YOU are here... In article , Dave Heil writes: After re-reading Brian's statement and my response, your comment makes no sense whatever. Poor baby. Another with intellectual presbyopia. Tsk, tsk. I had no idea that's what you were diagnosed with, Len. HAR! YOU are the one diagnosed with it... :-) Presbyopia: A common condition in humans around 40 and older where the eyeball becomes less flexible, thus requiring bifocal or trifocal lens correction for wide-range optical focussing. Intellectual presbyopia: A common condition among olde-tyme hammes of the morse persuasion whose mind has become inflexible and incapable of understanding communications they are not familiar with or not explained by the League in some publication such as "Talking for Dummies." I'm awfully sorry. True enough. [surprising self-depreciatory admission!] I should have realized that there was something behind these seemingly senseless outbursts of yours. Yes, those "outbursts" are down in the noise level of independent thought. You don't have much of that. I did you a favor and re-inserted the part you snipped. Why? Did your letter-tracing-finger run down to the bottom of the monitor again? If you look at the whole thing, perhaps it'll become clear to you how you made your error. My only "error" is considering that olde-tyme hammes of the morse persuasion MIGHT try to be civil or at least accept the fate of morse testing defeat with some grace. In that regard I was absolutely wrong and admit it freely. :-) Was there anything else, then? LHA / WMD |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
They would have had to successfully flown solo several times before getting a license. Gotta love this logic. You get to fly an airplane solo several times before you can get a pilots license, but can't get on HF without first taking a morse code test and getting a license. |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Mark, you must first understand the mind of Heil and Heil apologists. You left out "his running dogs and lackeys". Dave K8MN "Heil apologists" covers it, don't you think? |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
|
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (William) writes: Gotta love this logic. You get to fly an airplane solo several times before you can get a pilots license, but can't get on HF without first taking a morse code test and getting a license. So, there are a lot of things you must do first before you can solo in an aircraft, like learning how to land, takeoff, read sectional maps, navigate using landmarks, use the VOR for navigation, how to operate the radio and communicate with traffic control using proper procedures ect., ect., and prove to the instructor you can do all this and be safe in the aircraft by yourself. It is a lot more than learning simple Morse code. And by the way, you must be familier enough with Morse code to be able to look at the sectional map and interperate dots and dashes so you can identify VOR's, as the id is sent in code. Them are the rules...don't like it? then don't get a pilots license or ham license. Until the rules change, those are the requirements to meet, like it or not. ONLY in the "amateur service," Brian. Way back in 1958 any U.S. civilian could get on HF without any code test or ANY other test. :-) Been that way ever since. Not on the ham bands. SGC's SG-2020 HF transceiver is sold to private boat owners who don't have to take any morse test to operate it legally on HF. Not even if they buy power amplifiers to boost 20 W output to 400 W. But not for operation on the ham bands. Different service, different set of rules. Many, many, many government and military personnel operate on HF quite legally every day without having to take any morse test to "prove their technical ability" to be a "skilled radio operator." But not on the ham bands, different service, different set of requirements. Nope...in the US of A radio amateurs aren't "real" hams until they pass that archaic morse test...sez the "amateur community." Yep, until the rules change, to get a license for HF operation you must pass the code test. You claim you have no interest in getting a ham license so it shouldn't matter a whit to you, so what's your beef old man? Oh, I know, you can't pass the test. That's the LAW, and, by [expletive deleted], those olde-tyme hamme raddio kopps are going to enforce it no matter what! No, the olde-type hamme raddio kopps don't enforce anything, the FCC does and until the FCC changes the rules, it is the law. Even if the code test requirement is dropped you still won't be able to get a ham license because you can't pass the test, even as simple as it is today. |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
SGC's SG-2020 HF transceiver is sold to private boat owners who don't have to take any morse test to operate it legally on HF. Not even if they buy power amplifiers to boost 20 W output to 400 W. Yepper ...the same idiots I hear on the fishing boats utilizing the "F" bomb every other word on the bottom of the 30 meter band. CB afloat .... real role models .... and ya know what ...I don't even like tuna. 73 Tom KI3R |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|