| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Kane" wrote in
et: On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:25:38 GMT, Leo wrote: Which seems like a pretty cumbersome process - I wonder why the citizenship rules were placed in the US/Canada agreement? One would think that the licence would be sufficient to prove competence, and residency to prove QTH... Th4 U S cannot enter into a treaty that gives citizens of a third country privileges irregardless of whether they are permanent US residents or not. The treaty affects citizens of the two countries alone, CEPT notwithstanding. Become a US citizen and the problem goes away. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane That's odd, Phil, because a licence issued in another CEPT country will be valid anywhere but the US, conditional only not being a resident of the country you are in, and on it being in the CEPT agreement, regardless of what your citizenship is. As in many things, the US viewpoint is in a minority of one. Strange that. It's no problem, though. All I have to do is get my G licence re-issued, and unlike the US there is no 2-year time limit to worry about. 73 de Alun, N3KIP |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Extra class - question about the test | General | |||
| From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
| From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
| 1x2 Calls--automatic when upgrading to Extra? | Policy | |||