RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   My Idea For A New License Structure (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/27263-my-idea-new-license-structure.html)

Mike Coslo February 5th 04 03:51 AM

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...


I'd prefer it if the test were essay. not because it would be harder,
but because for me at least, it would be easier. I liked them in school,
I still like them.



You are assuming that the volunteer examiners are capable of
evaluating something other than multiple choice.


And how! That is the glaring problem with essay type questions. The
grader must understand the answer, and they must be able to understand
the answers that the student makes. Any less, and you have a big argument.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Len Over 21 February 5th 04 08:00 PM

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

I'd prefer it if the test were essay. not because it would be harder,
but because for me at least, it would be easier. I liked them in school,
I still like them.


You are assuming that the volunteer examiners are capable of
evaluating something other than multiple choice.


And how! That is the glaring problem with essay type questions. The
grader must understand the answer, and they must be able to understand
the answers that the student makes. Any less, and you have a big argument.


Don't all those VEs know all there is to know about radio?

Gosh, to hear the Extras talk in here they DO!

Since They Know All There Is To Know, there should be NO questions!

No questions, no discussion, they are supremely qualified by law.

Just demonstrate morsemanship skills and everyone is qualified to
operate on HF!

LHA / WMD

William February 5th 04 11:19 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

I'd prefer it if the test were essay. not because it would be harder,
but because for me at least, it would be easier. I liked them in school,
I still like them.

You are assuming that the volunteer examiners are capable of
evaluating something other than multiple choice.


And how! That is the glaring problem with essay type questions. The
grader must understand the answer, and they must be able to understand
the answers that the student makes. Any less, and you have a big argument.


Don't all those VEs know all there is to know about radio?

Gosh, to hear the Extras talk in here they DO!

Since They Know All There Is To Know, there should be NO questions!

No questions, no discussion, they are supremely qualified by law.

Just demonstrate morsemanship skills and everyone is qualified to
operate on HF!

LHA / WMD


Why, Len, just the other day I heard The Amateur Formerly Known As
(TAFKA) Rev. Jim say that the Morse Code test was a disincentive to
use CW on HF.

Maybe the earth has reversed polarity!

Or maybe he just got his tie stuck in his zipper.

William February 5th 04 11:21 PM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

For implementation sometime AFTER the "code issue" is resolved:


For some folks, it will only be resolved when there is no code testing at all.

(1) Amateur Basic.

Forty question test with access to 144mHz, 50Mhz, 28mHz, 21mHz,
18mHz, 7mHz and 1.8mHz.


Why no 80, 30, 20, or 12 meters? Why not allow 222 in hopes of increasing
use of the band?

Same phone allocations as other licensees on HF bands.


You mean same as Extras have now?


I believe he does. Is that a problem?

Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.


Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!


Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known as Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Limit 100 watts output on any band.


Requires RF exposure eval on higher bands. Why not 100/25?

(2) Amateur Advanced.

Additional written examination.


OK

All presently HF-licensed
Amateurs except Extras grandfathered to new license.


Even Novices and Techs? That's a worse giveaway than ARRL proposes!

Privileges
same as for former Advanced Class. Morse Code endorsement required
for operation in lower 100kHz of any band EXCEPT for those
previously
code tested or already holding an Element 1 CSCE. New licensees
(not
grandfathered operators) limit to 500 watts on any band.


See above about code test.

(3) Amateur Radio-God Expert for Life

(OK...that was for Lennie's benefit...I'D call it Amateur
Extra)


I have no idea why you bother with him, Steve.


It gets Steve out of bed in the morning.

Comprehensive closed-pool written test.


How? "Son Of Bash" would make it open pool quickly. Plus, how can you make a
case that only the top ticket gets a closed pool but open is OK for the others?

REQUIRED 5wpm Morse Code

test. Full Amateur allocations and privileges. Additional phone
allocations (or "wideband", if you prefer non-mode specific
classifi-
cations) from previous Novice class bands. Full power.

Why?


Three levels - good.
Incremental power and privs - good


You once told me when we had 7 license class distinctions that we
needed more classes.

Why the change now?

bb


TAFKA Rev. Jim, has the cat got your tongue?

William February 5th 04 11:22 PM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:


Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?


Why, Jim?


Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?

William February 6th 04 07:52 PM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:


Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?

Why, Jim?


Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?


C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?

Len Over 21 February 7th 04 06:57 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(William) wrote in message
.com...
(William) wrote in message
.com...
(William) wrote in message
.com...
(William) wrote in message
.com...
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:


Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and

as an
incentive to use voice only!

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very

same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?

Why, Jim?


Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?


In the past it's been "his way or the highway."

I reckon he's on the highway now...

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 February 7th 04 06:57 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(William) wrote in message
.com...
(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

For implementation sometime AFTER the "code issue" is resolved:

For some folks, it will only be resolved when there is no code testing at

all.

(1) Amateur Basic.

Forty question test with access to 144mHz, 50Mhz, 28mHz,

21mHz,
18mHz, 7mHz and 1.8mHz.

Why no 80, 30, 20, or 12 meters? Why not allow 222 in hopes of increasing
use of the band?

Same phone allocations as other licensees on HF bands.

You mean same as Extras have now?


I believe he does. Is that a problem?

Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!


Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known as Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Limit 100 watts output on any band.

Requires RF exposure eval on higher bands. Why not 100/25?

(2) Amateur Advanced.

Additional written examination.

OK

All presently HF-licensed
Amateurs except Extras grandfathered to new license.

Even Novices and Techs? That's a worse giveaway than ARRL proposes!

Privileges
same as for former Advanced Class. Morse Code endorsement

required
for operation in lower 100kHz of any band EXCEPT for those
previously
code tested or already holding an Element 1 CSCE. New

licensees
(not
grandfathered operators) limit to 500 watts on any band.

See above about code test.

(3) Amateur Radio-God Expert for Life

(OK...that was for Lennie's benefit...I'D call it Amateur
Extra)

I have no idea why you bother with him, Steve.


It gets Steve out of bed in the morning.

Comprehensive closed-pool written test.

How? "Son Of Bash" would make it open pool quickly. Plus, how can you

make a
case that only the top ticket gets a closed pool but open is OK for the

others?

REQUIRED 5wpm Morse Code

test. Full Amateur allocations and privileges. Additional

phone
allocations (or "wideband", if you prefer non-mode specific
classifi-
cations) from previous Novice class bands. Full power.

Why?

Three levels - good.
Incremental power and privs - good


You once told me when we had 7 license class distinctions that we
needed more classes.

Why the change now?

bb


TAFKA Rev. Jim, has the cat got your tongue?


It's sleeping on his bug.

Don't wake the dead.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 February 7th 04 06:57 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

Why, Len, just the other day I heard The Amateur Formerly Known As
(TAFKA) Rev. Jim say that the Morse Code test was a disincentive to
use CW on HF.

Maybe the earth has reversed polarity!

Or maybe he just got his tie stuck in his zipper.


I'll have to ignore it. Must have been some NCTA hacker that got
in here and forged the reverend's screen name. Gotta be false.

Does the reverend have zippers?

I thought the Amish only used button holes and hooks...

LHA / WMD

William February 7th 04 04:26 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

Why, Len, just the other day I heard The Amateur Formerly Known As
(TAFKA) Rev. Jim say that the Morse Code test was a disincentive to
use CW on HF.

Maybe the earth has reversed polarity!

Or maybe he just got his tie stuck in his zipper.


I'll have to ignore it. Must have been some NCTA hacker that got
in here and forged the reverend's screen name. Gotta be false.

Does the reverend have zippers?

I thought the Amish only used button holes and hooks...

LHA / WMD


You're right - MUST have been an imposter. Since the same
disincentive has been in place since 1912, I can't imagine TAFKA Rev.
Jim flubbing up like that. Not in a million years.

Whoever forged that post had to have been a complete moron.

My apologies to TAFKA Rev. Jim.

Len Over 21 February 8th 04 06:49 PM

In article ,
(William) writes:

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very

same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?

Why, Jim?


Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?


Lack of an answer must be due to endorphin overload or lack
of oxygen from the running. Maybe just lack of oxygen from his
rareified heights of code superiority.

Or maybe solder fumes from building a kit to add to his
collection of all home-built and designed ham rigs.

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 February 8th 04 06:49 PM

In article ,
(William) writes:

You're right - MUST have been an imposter. Since the same
disincentive has been in place since 1912, I can't imagine TAFKA Rev.
Jim flubbing up like that. Not in a million years.

Whoever forged that post had to have been a complete moron.

My apologies to TAFKA Rev. Jim.


Right! And to his dad, Franz Tafka!

[expletive deleted]

[humor deleted]

[reason, fact, and common sense deleted...]

[morse code testing deleted!] :-)

LHA / WMD

Steve Robeson, K4CAP February 10th 04 11:17 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...

In article ,
(N2EY)
writes:


But we're not going back to those days, so other methods must be used. One
solution is to make the question pool so large and varied that it's easier for
99% of prospective hams to just learn the material rather than memorize or
word-associate their way to a passing grade.


USA amateur radio regulations require only a MINIMUM of 10 for every
written test element question. There is NO maximum.

Anyone who wants a "tougher" test that all but the eidetic could not
memorize ought to bug the VEC Question Pool Committee. They
decide on how big the question pool is, not the FCC.


And unless the FCC closes the pools, it's of little use.

Also, too many of those "questions" and thier distractors are
just re-wordings of the same question...Still makes it easier to
"eliminate" the wrong answers rather than KNOW the correct one.

I've been repeating the above for quite a while...but it seems that
"new ideas" have a difficult time catching on...


You also repeated "I'm going to get an Extra Lite out of the box"
several times, but obvioulsy THAT "new idea" didn't catch on, even in
your OWN camp, Lennie.

Of course WE never expected you to keep your word...

Ya Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve Robeson, K4CAP February 10th 04 11:19 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Just like the difficulties I had with learning Morse, a person that has


trouble with drawing should just work hard at it!


Do you have...(SNIP)


"I am only here to civillly debate the Morse Code test issue"
Leonard H. Anderson.

Yet one more validation of the assertion that Lennie is a liar.

Thanks, Lennie...In this ONE endeavour you always prevail.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve Robeson, K4CAP February 10th 04 11:22 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

TAFKA Rev. Jim, has the cat got your tongue?


It's sleeping on his bug.

Don't wake the dead.


"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue"
Leonard H. Anderson.

It's so heartwarming to see Lennie the Liar and his Brain cuddled
up in newsgroup agitation....father and son.

Steve, K4YZ

William February 11th 04 02:41 AM

(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:


Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?

Why, Jim?

Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?


C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?



"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally

Len Over 21 February 11th 04 06:56 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?


"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally


Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD

William February 12th 04 12:02 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?


"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally


Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD


Is that where he revived the little dog with energized lamp cord?

William February 12th 04 12:04 AM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very

same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

Why?

Why, Jim?

Why, Jim?


Jim, don't you know why you say the things you say?


Lack of an answer must be due to endorphin overload or lack
of oxygen from the running. Maybe just lack of oxygen from his
rareified heights of code superiority.

Or maybe solder fumes from building a kit to add to his
collection of all home-built and designed ham rigs.

LHA / WMD



No. Tourette Syndrome.

Len Over 21 February 12th 04 01:42 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

Or maybe solder fumes from building a kit to add to his
collection of all home-built and designed ham rigs.

LHA / WMD


No. Tourette Syndrome.


Thank you! You have hit on the correct diagnosis!

LHA / WMD

Len Over 21 February 12th 04 01:42 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?

"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally


Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD


Is that where he revived the little dog with energized lamp cord?


I can't remember. The movie was under the Hayes Code, not the
morse code.

All I remember is that Meg was faking it in the coffee shop...just
like all the code-loving extra specials are faking it in here. Shrug.

LHA / WMD

William February 13th 04 01:52 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?

"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally

Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD


Is that where he revived the little dog with energized lamp cord?


I can't remember. The movie was under the Hayes Code, not the
morse code.

All I remember is that Meg was faking it in the coffee shop...just
like all the code-loving extra specials are faking it in here. Shrug.

LHA / WMD


I wonder if TAFKA Rev. Jim was faking it for all of those years that
he demanded a disincentive exam for access to CW on HF?

Len Over 21 February 14th 04 12:05 AM

In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?

"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally

Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD

Is that where he revived the little dog with energized lamp cord?


I can't remember. The movie was under the Hayes Code, not the
morse code.

All I remember is that Meg was faking it in the coffee shop...just
like all the code-loving extra specials are faking it in here. Shrug.

LHA / WMD


I wonder if TAFKA Rev. Jim was faking it for all of those years that
he demanded a disincentive exam for access to CW on HF?


Who knows for sure? All that comes back in replies is expurgated
with [expletive deleted] all over the place. Fake rules. Real stuff is
labeled "[expletive deleted]" and not allowed.

LHA / WMD

William February 14th 04 02:18 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

C'mon, Jim, do you really expect us to believe that the Morse Code
exam is a disincentive to using CW on HF?

"We've got a bleeder!"

from: When Harry Met Sally

Don't forget the redux on the Oriongasm scene by the other guy... :-)

LHA / WMD

Is that where he revived the little dog with energized lamp cord?

I can't remember. The movie was under the Hayes Code, not the
morse code.

All I remember is that Meg was faking it in the coffee shop...just
like all the code-loving extra specials are faking it in here. Shrug.

LHA / WMD


I wonder if TAFKA Rev. Jim was faking it for all of those years that
he demanded a disincentive exam for access to CW on HF?


Who knows for sure? All that comes back in replies is expurgated
with [expletive deleted] all over the place. Fake rules. Real stuff is
labeled "[expletive deleted]" and not allowed.

LHA / WMD


Maybe he now thinks that a Morse Code Exam is [expletive deleted]?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com