Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Policy
>
Why the ARRL proposed upgrading Technicians to General
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
5
February 16th 04, 12:00 AM
N2EY
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Jason Hsu) writes:
I understand why the ARRL proposes free upgrades from Technician to
General. The assumptions
Assumptions by ARRL, you mean...
:
1. The restructuring has to limit the number of license classes to 3.
Thus, the Advanced license and either the Novice license or
Technician license must be eliminated.
2. The restructuring must produce no downgrades.
3. The closing of the Novice class in the restructuring of 2000 was a
major loss. So the Technician license should be eliminated but the
Novice license should be reopened.
4. The only way to eliminate the Technician class without downgrading
the existing Technicians is to automatically upgrade all Technicians
to General.
I still disagree with the ARRL's proposal, though I can now see the
reasoning behind it.
I think your analysis is very accurate, Jason, except for 3)
I think the flawed assumption is #3.
Consider replacing your 3) with this one:
"3) The entry-level license class should be more balanced between HF and
VHF/UHF than the Tech is toady. The Tech gives all VHF-UHF, but no HF/MF, and
even if the code test is passed, all that you get is tiny slices of HF and two
modes. The ARS would be better off with an entry level license class that has a
better sampling of HF-VHF-UHF privileges, yet doesn't require a more stringent
written test"
If the closing of the Novice class was such a major loss, then why was the
No-Code Technician license so much more popular than the Novice
license during the years when both entry-level licenses were
available?
See above. It's not that the old Novice was a great loss - it's that the Tech
isn;t the best we can do for an entry-level license. At least, that's the ARRL
BoD thinking.
The FCC closed the Novice license for the same reason
General Motors closed Oldsmobile - not enough takers.
Exactly!
In reality, what is being proposed is more of a whole new entry level class
than a reopening of the old Novice. They would do better to give it a different
name - I suggest "Basic". Then you'd have Basic, General, Extra.
I'd prefer to see all Novices and Technicians merged into a new
Technician class and be granted Tech Plus privileges. This would be
compatible with a 3-license system. Nobody would lose privileges, but
all automatic upgrades would be modest.
Problem is, the license class would still be VHF/UHF heavy and HF light.
As many have suggested, I think the ARRL proposal may have been a
PR
move. Although changing the rules is the FCC's job and not the
ARRL's, anything that the ARRL could have proposed would have
generated a firestorm of controversy.
Bingo!
But somebody has to propose things, and if ARRL proposed nothing they'd be
criticized for that too.
The ARRL had to propose the
retention of the Morse Code exam requirement for the Amateur Extra
license to appeal to the proponents of Morse Code testing.
Yep, a compromise.
To appeal
to the No Code Technicians feeling intimidated by the Morse Code exam
requirement, the ARRL proposed upgrading them to General.
Not really. The ARRL proposal would drop the code test for General, so all that
any Tech or Plus would have to do to get a General is to pass the 35 question
General test.
The main reason for the free upgrade is to eliminate license classes that
newcomers will not be able to get anymore. The BoD thinks that is a very high
priority, even though there don't seem to be any problems with having almost
120,000 hams in closed-off license classes (Novice and Advanced) for the past 4
years.
There may also be hope that the free upgrades will spur activity among inactive
or rarely active Techs and Tech Pluses. Whether this will happen is
questionable, given the ease with which those hams can upgrade to General.
73 de Jim N2EY
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access
Lloyd Mitchell
Antenna
43
October 26th 04
01:37 AM
ARRL has proposed nuking morse code for HF access
Night Ranger
General
7
January 29th 04
07:07 PM
My alternative to upgrading all Technicians to General
Jason Hsu
Policy
2
January 28th 04
04:36 PM
Upgrading to from Tech Plus to General, help on a FCC Form 605 question please
Jerry Bransford
General
6
December 1st 03
02:37 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License)
N2EY
Policy
0
November 30th 03
01:28 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
02:28 AM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks