![]() |
|
WAR! What is it good for?
No, it's not a political protest thread.
Just a description of what it took to be a radio operator at radio station WAR back in WW2. Copied from a Yahoo reflector: This from an article in Radio News of November '42 regarding the radio station WAR. "...The average person thinks of a highly trained radio operator a man who can send radiograms with very little confusion and at a fair rate of speed....say the messages are actually handled at around fifteen or even twenty words a minute for a short period of time. The radio operator on duty at WAR must send or receive or both at a rate of more than fifty words a minute during the eight hours of his tour of duty. He must understand the delicate equipment such as teletypwriters, radio types and siphon recording equipment. He must be able to read manual signals at more than thirty words a minute and to handle traffic at this speed if necessary. He must be able to read from recording tape at more than fifty words a minute and he must be able to operate a teletype machine..." From [the author's] recollection in 1942 when WAR operators were tested they had to touchtype at 100 wpm, use a Kleinschmidt perforator at a high rate of speed and copy recorded slip tape at 100 wpm as well as sending and receiving manually when the automatic systems would not function. Operators there at that time included W3GRF(sk), W0DX (sk) W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US and others. |
|
"N2EY" wrote in message ... No, it's not a political protest thread. Just a description of what it took to be a radio operator at radio station WAR back in WW2. Copied from a Yahoo reflector: This from an article in Radio News of November '42 regarding the radio station WAR. "...The average person thinks of a highly trained radio operator a man who can send radiograms with very little confusion and at a fair rate of speed....say the messages are actually handled at around fifteen or even twenty words a minute for a short period of time. The radio operator on duty at WAR must send or receive or both at a rate of more than fifty words a minute during the eight hours of his tour of duty. He must understand the delicate equipment such as teletypwriters, radio types and siphon recording equipment. He must be able to read manual signals at more than thirty words a minute and to handle traffic at this speed if necessary. He must be able to read from recording tape at more than fifty words a minute and he must be able to operate a teletype machine..." From [the author's] recollection in 1942 when WAR operators were tested they had to touchtype at 100 wpm, use a Kleinschmidt perforator at a high rate of speed and copy recorded slip tape at 100 wpm as well as sending and receiving manually when the automatic systems would not function. Operators there at that time included W3GRF(sk), W0DX (sk) W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US and others. Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI |
In article .net, "Dan/W4NTI"
w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: Operators there at that time included W3GRF(sk), W0DX (sk) W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US and others. Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Go for it, Dan boy, "real" hams even if SK by now. :-) In all fairness, Washington Army Radio was an old, small effort using old-fashioned (for its time, not ours) up until about the summer of 1942. Quite inadequate to mount a worldwide war effort. The largest real communications network was maintained by the US Navy back then (they had already introduced TTY to warships of cruiser size and above by 1940, the Sigaba real-time encryption cut in in 1941). The U.S. Army Signal Corps of the beginning 1942 times was, and their historians grudgingly admit it, not up to the herculean task ahead. Prior to the Japanese striking Pearl Harbor on the morning of 7 December 1941, the warning message to the Army commander on Pearl was sent by RCA commercial-carrier message, not over any Army radio circuit. The very first HT (a Motorola design) was operational in 1941, even used by FDR's Secret Service personnel, but in limited quantities. The backpack walkie-talkie was still in the design phase in the summer of 1942, as was the Hallicrafters conversion of their commercial HF transmitter to the BC-610 military model. High- power HF transmitters in the military of early '42 were largely off-the-shelf commercial models or the antiquated 1 KW BC-339 and its big brother, the 10 KW BC-340. ACAN, Army Command and Administrative Network, was a rather sorry lot in the middle of 1942, mostly the left-overs of the 20s and 30s sparky days hardly more than amateur efforts with uniforms. That would change remarkably in the next year, taking at least two plateau jumps in both equipment type and quantity...field tested in North Africa and Italy and over the enormous spans of the Pacific as that island- by-island campaign began...the Army long-distance radio comms greatly helped by the USN in the Pacific. What had been a picayune effort by the Army up to about the middle of 1942 ended by 1943. By then there was less reliance on commercial radio carriers for long-distance communications and a tremendous growth of INTEGRATED wire and radio, truly networked to enable the excellent logistics capability of the US military demonstrated in WW2. The era of copying the sparky methods of the USN for land use was ending...the Army was expanding in technology of radio and electronics much like the end product of the Manhattan Project. The second-highest national priority level (behind only the A-bomb project) of WW2 was the production of quartz crystals for radios. In the last three years of WW2, quartz crystal unit production averaged 1 million units per month from over 30 companies in the USA! Not any sort of "amateur" effort." Galvin (later Motorola) was the production Hq for the quartz crystals in a time when artificial quartz blank growth was not yet known. The vast majority of those crystal units was intended for non-morse-code radios used on land and in the air and on landing craft. The core of network messaging in the military of WW2 was the teleprinter, principally the militarized models from the Teletype Corporation headquartered in Chicago...as were Hallicrafters and Motorola. Teleprinters were ideal for integrated communications, operating well over both wirelines and radio, capable of 60 words per minute continuously, needing only to be fed paper and ribbons and some occasional oil. The image of the lone morseman with headphones and hunched over his code key saving the nation was only that...an image...no relation to reality. That image is UNreal. LHA / WMD |
In article .net,
w4nti@get says... "N2EY" wrote in message ... No, it's not a political protest thread. Just a description of what it took to be a radio operator at radio station WAR back in WW2. Copied from a Yahoo reflector: This from an article in Radio News of November '42 regarding the radio station WAR. "...The average person thinks of a highly trained radio operator a man who can send radiograms with very little confusion and at a fair rate of speed....say the messages are actually handled at around fifteen or even twenty words a minute for a short period of time. The radio operator on duty at WAR must send or receive or both at a rate of more than fifty words a minute during the eight hours of his tour of duty. He must understand the delicate equipment such as teletypwriters, radio types and siphon recording equipment. He must be able to read manual signals at more than thirty words a minute and to handle traffic at this speed if necessary. He must be able to read from recording tape at more than fifty words a minute and he must be able to operate a teletype machine..." From [the author's] recollection in 1942 when WAR operators were tested they had to touchtype at 100 wpm, use a Kleinschmidt perforator at a high rate of speed and copy recorded slip tape at 100 wpm as well as sending and receiving manually when the automatic systems would not function. Operators there at that time included W3GRF(sk), W0DX (sk) W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US and others. Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI Yes indeed - I'm still irked about having to pass the 20WPM code for my extra while a friend of mine skated through when they started lowering the code standards. Have I taken soldering iron, cutters, etc. to gear? Sure I have. But right now I really don't have the time to homebrew gear. |
|
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote in message ... No, it's not a political protest thread. Just a description of what it took to be a radio operator at radio station WAR back in WW2. Copied from a Yahoo reflector: This from an article in Radio News of November '42 regarding the radio station WAR. "...The average person thinks of a highly trained radio operator a man who can send radiograms with very little confusion and at a fair rate of speed....say the messages are actually handled at around fifteen or even twenty words a minute for a short period of time. The radio operator on duty at WAR must send or receive or both at a rate of more than fifty words a minute during the eight hours of his tour of duty. He must understand the delicate equipment such as teletypwriters, radio types and siphon recording equipment. He must be able to read manual signals at more than thirty words a minute and to handle traffic at this speed if necessary. He must be able to read from recording tape at more than fifty words a minute and he must be able to operate a teletype machine..." From [the author's] recollection in 1942 when WAR operators were tested they had to touchtype at 100 wpm, use a Kleinschmidt perforator at a high rate of speed and copy recorded slip tape at 100 wpm as well as sending and receiving manually when the automatic systems would not function. Operators there at that time included W3GRF(sk), W0DX (sk) W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US and others. Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI Not real hams. Amateur Radio was suspended at the time, unless you consider a real ham to be one without operating priveleges. And hopefully they weren't operating WAR using W3GRF, W0DX, W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US, or other callsigns. |
William wrote:
Nice trip down mammary lane, but what has this to do with amateur radio? Excellent work netdeputy. Poster is off-topic and I do believe the clever title, despite his disclaimer, shows his true colors as a lily-livered peacenik terrorsymp THREAT. I say we both turn him in, and split the 500 Patriot Points we'll revceive for bagging this traitor. -- It Came From C. L. Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries. http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net "Religion isn't the opiate of the masses. When properly used, religion is the methamphetamine of the masses." - nu-monet v6.0 in alt.slack |
|
|
"William" wrote in message om... (William) wrote in message . com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI Not real hams. Amateur Radio was suspended at the time, unless you consider a real ham to be one without operating priveleges. And hopefully they weren't operating WAR using W3GRF, W0DX, W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US, or other callsigns. Hey Dan, tell me about these wannabees we have today. C'mon Dan, tell me about them. If you unzip very slowly you might get your tie out w/o too much damage, hihi. Hey look everybody....another CBPlusser. Dan/W4NTI "We've got another bleeder!" |
|
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (William) writes: When TAFKARJ wants to talk Army radio, it is wholesome and wunnerful, and has everything to do with amateur radio somehow, even though amateur radio was OUTLAWED at the time he speaks of. Careful about those emotionally-loaded words, next thing you know we will have another Sermon On The Antenna Mount about the glory and the majesty of morse code. I don't think these guys are complete fools, but there edging their way over. Not fools in the true sense. They are just BELIEVERS in the Church of St. Hiram. None of them had anything to do with Army radio and so they grasp at idolized imagination straws trying to promote morse code and the old ways. If they find some scrap of information that supports their evangelism, they will want to scrap with anyone about it and its veracity. :-) "Poor baby. Still INVOLVED with tossing personal insults and nasty comments to others that don't agree with your views." --Leonard H. Anderson, Feb. 27, 2004 Dave K8MN |
|
|
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: Not fools in the true sense. They are just BELIEVERS in the Church of St. Hiram. None of them had anything to do with Army radio and so they grasp at idolized imagination straws trying to promote morse code and the old ways. If they find some scrap of information that supports their evangelism, they will want to scrap with anyone about it and its veracity. :-) "Poor baby. Still INVOLVED with tossing personal insults and nasty comments to others that don't agree with your views." --Leonard H. Anderson, Feb. 27, 2004 "I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue" --Leonard H. Anderson on occassions too numerous... Steve, K4YZ |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net...
"William" wrote in message om... (William) wrote in message . com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI Not real hams. Amateur Radio was suspended at the time, unless you consider a real ham to be one without operating priveleges. And hopefully they weren't operating WAR using W3GRF, W0DX, W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US, or other callsigns. Hey Dan, tell me about these wannabees we have today. C'mon Dan, tell me about them. If you unzip very slowly you might get your tie out w/o too much damage, hihi. Hey look everybody....another CBPlusser. Dan/W4NTI DAn, I never held a license that said "plus" on it. You'll just have to do better than that. |
|
ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article , (Len Over 21) writes: The core of network messaging in the military of WW2 was the teleprinter, principally the militarized models from the Teletype Corporation headquartered in Chicago...as were Hallicrafters and Motorola. Teleprinters were ideal for integrated communications, operating well over both wirelines and radio, capable of 60 words per minute continuously, needing only to be fed paper and ribbons and some occasional oil. The image of the lone morseman with headphones and hunched over his code key saving the nation was only that...an image...no relation to reality. That image is UNreal. Some Snippage Your credibility is zero. You claim that Morse/CW was essentially unheard of as a primary military communications mode, when, in fact, all of the evidence is that exactly the opposite is true. Leonard H. Anderson has never had a problem with misrepresenting the truth even when the evidence to the contrary was plentiful and well known to all concerned. That he feels compelled to continue to make a mockery of his "character" and humiliate his family name so readily in a public forum should be adequate evidence that this old man is NOT dealing with a full deck. He's ill. That's all there is to it. OK. You hate CW. We get it. There's no need to make a barefaced liar out of yourself to prove your point. Ooooooops! Too late! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
In article , ospam
(Larry Roll K3LT) writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: The core of network messaging in the military of WW2 was the teleprinter, principally the militarized models from the Teletype Corporation headquartered in Chicago...as were Hallicrafters and Motorola. Teleprinters were ideal for integrated communications, operating well over both wirelines and radio, capable of 60 words per minute continuously, needing only to be fed paper and ribbons and some occasional oil. The image of the lone morseman with headphones and hunched over his code key saving the nation was only that...an image...no relation to reality. That image is UNreal. LHA / WMD Loonie: Er, I mean, "Lennie." Sorry. How come the "image of the lone morseman with headphones" is so predominant, if it is not true? In virtually every depiction of WWII-Era military communications, the mode being used is Morse/CW. If all you see is a code key and all you hear is beeping morse, then all that can be "depicted to you" is the lone morseman valiantly serving his country heroically through his skill at morsemanship. :-) I didn't invent the blinders you are wearing and certainly wouldn't wear the blunders you make as a "communications veteran of the military." You've never served the USAF in any capacity as a communicator on radio or wirelines and certainly NOT before 1956. You just don't know anything but what you've read or seen in stories told by others. I know had have known many WWII-Era military radio operators, and they were all able to use Morse/CW conversationally at speeds in excess of 50 WPM. They told tales of pulling duty watches in which they spent the entire time with headphones on listening for message traffic in CW. You know damn few if any at all. World War 2 ENDED almost 59 years ago. Well before your time. While they have also spoken of the use of radioteletype, for the most part, that was used only for the most routine, non-secure message traffic, and mainly within the CONUS between military installations and defense manufacturing facilities (which were on a landline net). Poor baby...still trying to foist the "depictions" thing again when you've had NO possible experience in anything military before 1956. Teleprinter - with or without encryption ("Sigaba") - was begun in the USN in 1940 on ships of cruiser and heavier class. The HIGHEST security level required encrypted teleprinter...on ships that meant radioteleprinter. How did you think the decrypted "Purple code" messages were forwarded? By bicycle messenger, hand carried? How do you think the Battle of Midway was coordinated in order to surprise the Japanese fleet? Encrypted teleprinter is the answer. Do you think the M-209 Code Converter was used solely for morse communications? Little unit, non-electrical device for lower-level cryptographic purposes, made by the thousands by typewriter companies during WW2. Museum artifact now just as morse keys are relics everywhere but in amateur radio. You want to hold the OLD image of Washington Army Radio in your mind because it is safe, secure, and understandable and that you want to be a Big Man because you have tested at higher morse rates as an AMATEUR. You have NO concept of W-A-R as it grew after the USA involvement with war became increased. You have NO real concept of military radio during WW2 other than third- and fourth-hand tales and the selective histories of amateur radio publications. Your credibility is zero. Only in your imagination. I BEGAN in radio communications IN the military in 1953 and remained at that assignment for three years. HF radio transmission 24/7 trans-Pacific at the 3rd largest ACAN station (first was W-A-R) in terms of messages handled. I've been involved with military communications methods, concentrating on design concerning them full-time and in a consulting basis. That's through the plateau jumps in technology over a half century that includes the demise of the vacuum tube and into the era of the large- scale integrated circuits of solid-state electronics. Hands-on all the way. Can you say the same after thumbing through old ham mags? You've never carried an AN/PRC-6 or AN/PRC-10 or hand-cranked an AN/GRC-9 or spoken over an AN/GRC-26 in its little hut on the bed of a deuce and a half. [the -6 and -10 are/were VHF and voice, the -9 was CW/voice and the -26 RTTY/Voice] That was just IN the military. You've never carried an AN/PRC-119 SINCGARS on your back and have no real idea of what it is even though a quarter million of them have been produced. It worked 30 to 88 MHz where you fear to tread as a morse purist. You've never even had an AN/PRC-104 on your back either even though it IS an HF radio...it's mode is voice or data like the -119. You've never had to control the mobile and ground variants based on the R/Ts. You've never used the AN/ARCs of the USAF or the radionav equipment and probably couldn't define "station" location in an aircraft. You've never used a TTY terminal order-wire and certainly not a KL-7 ancient machine (whose details made WO Walker some money once). As a USAF "twenty" veteran you had all your military experience behind a DESK filling out FORMS. You have NO communications experience while in the military or out of it other than amateur radio. You show NO sign of being familiar with any military radios by nomenclature or familiar name nor do you know any non-military radios other than those featured in ads of ham magazines. You don't show any signs of wanting to know...even though you could go to the USAF ACAS website and download a free book of USAF radio history. I doubt you ever used a KY-nn of any kind during your desk-jockey air days of communicating over a handset (I include the jelly unless you were into a hand set). You claim that Morse/CW was essentially unheard of as a primary military communications mode, when, in fact, all of the evidence is that exactly the opposite is true. [expletive deleted] sweetums. From 1948 onwards W-A-R and all of ACAN made on-off keying morsemanship downsized to nothing for all fixed-point to fixed-point circuits that bore the brunt of military messaging. The USN did the same from about 1960 onwards and the USAF did it in between USA and USN. There's all kinds of documentary PROOF that is for public dissemination and has been for years. You can start at the USAF AFCC at Scott Field and work outward. "Radio" works by the same physics regardless of an administration's label of type or kind. Download "From Flares to Satellites" for an overview, a good history of communications in the USAF...although a bit too condensed at only about 90 pages with only a few illustrations. You can put on your blinders and pump up your morsemanship all you want. Such will appeal to PCTAs who long for "good old days" that, like you, they never really experienced in their lifetimes. You will, of course, demand that reality is like your imaginings and refuse to believe anyone who was actually IN military communications. If you have the chutzpah you can call such as "liars" in a grande job of snowmanship newsgroup poker which only proves that YOU are the massive LIAR in here. LHA / WMD |
(William) wrote in message . com...
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... "William" wrote in message om... (William) wrote in message . com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... Real hams. Not these wanabees we have today. Dan/W4NTI Not real hams. Amateur Radio was suspended at the time, unless you consider a real ham to be one without operating priveleges. And hopefully they weren't operating WAR using W3GRF, W0DX, W9BRD/VA3ZBB, W0US, or other callsigns. Hey Dan, tell me about these wannabees we have today. C'mon Dan, tell me about them. If you unzip very slowly you might get your tie out w/o too much damage, hihi. Hey look everybody....another CBPlusser. Dan/W4NTI DAn, I never held a license that said "plus" on it. You'll just have to do better than that. Hey Dan, put on a fresh tie and try it again. |
|
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Scumbag. Your wife still sleeping with Ben-Gay under her nose to smother the stench? Steve, K4YZ Steve, is this what you call rational discussion? I didn't set the parameters of the discussion, PuppetBoy. This is all Lennie understands...It's all he wants...I am just satisfying his need to be humiliated. Consider it a Good Samaritan act. Steve, K4YZ |
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Scumbag. Your wife still sleeping with Ben-Gay under her nose to smother the stench? Steve, K4YZ Steve, is this what you call rational discussion? I didn't set the parameters of the discussion, PuppetBoy. So how low will you go? This is all Lennie understands...It's all he wants...I am just satisfying his need to be humiliated. Consider it a Good Samaritan act. Steve, K4YZ You're out of control. Just ask anyone. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... Scumbag. Your wife still sleeping with Ben-Gay undr her nose to smotehr the stench? Steve, K4YZ Steve, is this what you call rational discussion? The worst part is he can't even hold hisself together long enough to type properly... :-) [ "undr"..."smotehr"...typical rage symptoms shown many times ] LHA / WMD He's out of control. Again. |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ... In article , (Len Over 21) writes: The core of network messaging in the military of WW2 was the teleprinter, principally the militarized models from the Teletype Corporation headquartered in Chicago...as were Hallicrafters and Motorola. Teleprinters were ideal for integrated communications, operating well over both wirelines and radio, capable of 60 words per minute continuously, needing only to be fed paper and ribbons and some occasional oil. The image of the lone morseman with headphones and hunched over his code key saving the nation was only that...an image...no relation to reality. That image is UNreal. Some Snippage Your credibility is zero. You claim that Morse/CW was essentially unheard of as a primary military communications mode, when, in fact, all of the evidence is that exactly the opposite is true. Leonard H. Anderson has never had a problem with misrepresenting the truth even when the evidence to the contrary was plentiful and well known to all concerned. That he feels compelled to continue to make a mockery of his "character" and humiliate his family name so readily in a public forum should be adequate evidence that this old man is NOT dealing with a full deck. He's ill. That's all there is to it. OK. You hate CW. We get it. There's no need to make a barefaced liar out of yourself to prove your point. Ooooooops! Too late! 73 Steve, K4YZ Steve, now that you and Larry are tailending each other, why not ask him about his mode always saving the day. He has multiple scenarios, so you won't get bored. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... Scumbag. Your wife still sleeping with Ben-Gay undr her nose to smotehr the stench? Steve, K4YZ Steve, is this what you call rational discussion? The worst part is he can't even hold hisself together long enough to type properly... :-) [ "undr"..."smotehr"...typical rage symptoms shown many times ] LHA / WMD He's out of control. Again. For the nth time in here. Notice that the gunnery nurse will slowly crib my phrases and words, just like he does with yours, then claim them to be his own. :-) For example, he said that Washington Army Radio has "played host to amateurs many times" without mentioning when and where. He really doesn't know but it comes out of his imagination. He's never had any occasion to communicate with Washington Army Radio, hasn't been there, doesn't know where it is (if it still exists), or a single detail of the place. Washington Army Radio (WAR) doesn't exist as it did a half century ago. Back then it was a technical tryout area for automatic TTY relay, techniques that were incorporated into AUTODIN. AUTODIN was later replaced by the DSN or Digital Switched Network, "the government's own Internet" and now used by the entire U.S. military. Messaging over HF does exist but in a much reduced, secondary role, using higher-rate data modes that possible even with the old 100 WPM teleprinters. In the U.S. Army, Signal Brigades world- wide have the capability and do periodic test exercises to make sure they are ready. What my old Signal Battalion became a half century later (78th, under the 516th SigBde located at Fort Shafter) has is an "HF Radio Department." Probably called that for lack of any other descriptive title. :-) That's on the 78th SigBn website. Not much information there. There's no website for "Washington Army Radio." It was dissolved long before the Internet became public a dozen-plus years ago. Yet, there are hundreds of military websites available at link lists for all the U.S. military branch home pages, including every Army MOS and the headquarters for Military Intelligence (where morse code cognition is taught from computers for M.I. intercepts). Has the gunnery nurse ever been to WAR, not "hostile actions?" I doubt either. :-) Those are shadowlands in his imagination and fantasies. A twilight zone he can never experience in reality. But, the gunnery nurse has an Amateur Extra license! So does a seven-year-old. Emotionally they are the same, probably the nod to the seven-year-old as being more mature. :-) LHA / WMD |
|
|
|
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message om... I wonder. Has the 7 year old Extra been married numerous times? Why? Figure you may have found somone who you can actually communicate with on a peer-level, Brain? Or are 7-year olds just your style? Steve, K4YZ You're sick. Get help. I just guessed that the seven year old doesn't have as much emotional baggage as you appear to have. |
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... You're out of control. Just ask anyone. "They" are free to comment or editorialize as they see fit. No they aren't. They are bound by the PCTA Double Standard, same as you. Look how long it took for TAFKARJ to declare that Pro-Code Bruce was an idiot - years and years of prodding. |
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... I wonder. Has the 7 year old Extra been married numerous times? Why? Figure you may have found somone who you can actually communicate with on a peer-level, Brain? Or are 7-year olds just your style? Steve, K4YZ You're sick. Get help. I'M SICK...?!?! YOU, you sick twerp, were the one suggesting a 7 year old has been married...!!! I just guessed that the seven year old doesn't have as much emotional baggage as you appear to have. Again, YOU are the one making some very sick suggestions, Brain... Or would "Brainless" be more appropriate...?!?! Sheesh! What a PUTZ! (Not surprising, though...considering your running company...) Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... I wonder. Has the 7 year old Extra been married numerous times? Why? Figure you may have found somone who you can actually communicate with on a peer-level, Brain? Or are 7-year olds just your style? Steve, K4YZ You're sick. Get help. I'M SICK...?!?! YOU, you sick twerp, were the one suggesting a 7 year old has been married...!!! They are in some countries. That doesn't mean they have marital relations. I just guessed that the seven year old doesn't have as much emotional baggage as you appear to have. Again, YOU are the one making some very sick suggestions, Brain... No. I just figured that the seven year old wasn't messed up like you. Now I'm sure of it. |
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Again, YOU are the one making some very sick suggestions, Brain... No. I just figured that the seven year old wasn't messed up like you. Whew...Coming from you, that hurt...(NOT!) Especially since you can't seem to get your own stories straight... Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Again, YOU are the one making some very sick suggestions, Brain... No. I just figured that the seven year old wasn't messed up like you. Whew...Coming from you, that hurt...(NOT!) Especially since you can't seem to get your own stories straight... Steve, K4YZ Steve, I have no trouble keeping my "stories" straight. That's the beauty of telling the truth. Try it sometime - after you're back on your meds. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com