|
|
|
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... I am not the one who sets the rules, Brain. You set your own rules. Only when it comes to not accepting bullying and lying as acceptable public behaviour. Correct. You don't follow that rule, but you should. You're favorite rule is "Do as I say, not as I do." |
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... (William) wrote in message .com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... I am not the one who sets the rules, Brain. You set your own rules. Only when it comes to not accepting bullying and lying as acceptable public behaviour. Correct. You don't follow that rule, but you should. You're favorite rule is "Do as I say, not as I do." If he yells at you again "FALL DOWN AND GIVE ME TWENTY!!!" tell him you have no cash but ask if he'll take PayPal instead... :-) LHA / WMD |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Whether I've failed or not is immaterial to your being nuts. You would be nuts with or without my presence on rrap. Best of luck. He has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams in that. I am curious as to what training eithr of you ahve had in psychiatry...?!?! The same "training" that Lennie has had in Amateur Radio, no doubt. And Brain, you have indeed, in public, failed... Steve, K4YZ |
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Whether I've failed or not is immaterial to your being nuts. You would be nuts with or without my presence on rrap. Best of luck. Luck is not needed here, Brain. That which you call "nuts" is simply your attempt to writhe away from being publically humiliated over and over, Brain. Perhaps if YOU reconsidered YOUR own rhetoric and conduct, that which you consider "nuts" would cease...?!?! I consider anyone who publically expresses admiration for a person who has been thoroughly documented as a liar and antagonist as "nuts". I consider anyone who makes public assertions that they either cannot substantiate or validate via some third party source as "nuts". I consider anyone who's been caught doing those things who then PERSISTS in doing them, contrary to evidence against them, as nuts. All of those things, Brain, would be you... If calling me "nuts" makes you sleep better, or you feel you got your sucker punch in, well then, I hope it makes that warm fuzzy feeling for you. I think the evidence of odd behaviour rests on YOUR shoulders, Brain...not anyone elses. That I (or anyone else) apparently manage to effectively rub your nose in your own errors and foolishness doesn't make me (us) nuts...Just glad for the entertainment you provide. For that I (we) thank you. Steve, K4YZ |
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes: (William) wrote in message .com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... That I (or anyone else) apparently manage to effectively rub your nose in your own errors and foolishness doesn't make me (us) nuts...Just glad for the entertainment you provide. For that I (we) thank you. Your only contribution in here seems to be one of FIGHTING your own little personal battles with imaginary foes and generally coming unglued at the slightest provocation. That's unstable behavior, obvious to lay people. LHA / WMD |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com